From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Reiner Steib Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Problem with Gnus Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2004 20:49:58 +0100 Message-ID: References: <41782B7B.10305@gnu.org> <41792EFE.5070406@compsol.cc> Reply-To: Reiner Steib NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1100461826 1644 80.91.229.6 (14 Nov 2004 19:50:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2004 19:50:26 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Nov 14 20:50:13 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CTQO4-0002xD-00 for ; Sun, 14 Nov 2004 20:50:12 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CTQWj-00060u-8L for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 14 Nov 2004 14:59:09 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CTQWb-00060o-0F for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Nov 2004 14:59:01 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CTQWa-00060c-Jb for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Nov 2004 14:59:00 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CTQWa-00060Z-9j for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Nov 2004 14:59:00 -0500 Original-Received: from [134.60.1.1] (helo=mail-new.rz.uni-ulm.de) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 4.34) id 1CTQNt-0006UY-Er for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Nov 2004 14:50:01 -0500 Original-Received: from lumberjack.physik.uni-ulm.de (lumberjack.physik.uni-ulm.de [134.60.10.173]) by mail.uni-ulm.de (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id iAEJnxWl017203; Sun, 14 Nov 2004 20:49:59 +0100 (MET) Original-Received: by lumberjack.physik.uni-ulm.de (Postfix, from userid 170) id A7AF81817D; Sun, 14 Nov 2004 20:49:58 +0100 (CET) Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Original-To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen X-Face: .*T0'iU(sujq_j9\J>-d4fg; N/1++U#U$_5ii6k.=|"-n'?5O:Hyz&wi'-!I~,}7~GgT=0S /&-R5sbkNy5+Xo1y{Tw2KKxi@Xh"g@]Qc|.U<*]WDd)qvGowFDvfU1F]{EDho:7P0@|oOD=Bc{K4?> WP68K[Mx:}=`ZT'6g4'f+g?;`vri2!)xGy}3:=l'(/Cea0l4lo^H5#@/Z3ev In-Reply-To: (Kevin Greiner's message of "Sun, 24 Oct 2004 12:17:32 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-DCC-dcc3mcgill-Metrics: gemini 1275; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:29824 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:29824 On Sun, Oct 24 2004, Kevin Greiner wrote: > Reiner Steib writes: >> On Sat, Oct 23 2004, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen wrote: >>> Reiner Steib writes: >>> >>>> Hm, as the new agent code is in the v5-10 branch too and we intend to >>>> release 5.10.7 from this branch some day, shouldn't the upgrade >>>> functions be assigned to 5.10.7 *and* we should bump the version in >>>> the v5-10 branch to 5.10.7 [1] now? Else people using the v5-10 >>>> branch outside of CVS-Emacs won't get the proper upgrade functions >>>> (though I doubt that many people use this branch). (In the meantime, I heard of some people using the v5-10 branch.) >>>> Lars, WDYT? >>> >>> Hm... why is the new agent code in 5.10? There really shouldn't be >>> anything there except bug fixes, right? >> >> Kevin's changes in 5.10 should fix several bugs in the agent code of >> 5.10.6. (I don't know the details since I don't use the agent.) [...] > There has only been one truely new agent feature added to No Gnus. > That feature was NOT added to the v5-10 branch. Of the code that was > checked in, the only thing that was not clearly an agent bug fix was > the gnus version upgrade changes. Lars, is it okay to bump the version in v5-10 branch to 5.10.7 and assign the agent upgrade functions to 5.10.7? Bye, Reiner. -- ,,, (o o) ---ooO-(_)-Ooo--- | PGP key available | http://rsteib.home.pages.de/