From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Reiner Steib Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: PURESIZE increased (again) Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 23:03:03 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87lku5u6tx.fsf@pacem.orebokech.com> Reply-To: Reiner Steib NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1145567018 4737 80.91.229.2 (20 Apr 2006 21:03:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 21:03:38 +0000 (UTC) Cc: romain@orebokech.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Apr 20 23:03:35 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FWgJD-0000Wo-9P for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 20 Apr 2006 23:03:27 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FWgJC-0001QU-Lm for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 20 Apr 2006 17:03:26 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FWgJ2-0001QP-Pu for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Apr 2006 17:03:16 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FWgJ0-0001QC-6I for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Apr 2006 17:03:16 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FWgJ0-0001Q9-1F for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Apr 2006 17:03:14 -0400 Original-Received: from [134.60.1.1] (helo=mail.uni-ulm.de) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.52) id 1FWgKI-00048o-Hz; Thu, 20 Apr 2006 17:04:38 -0400 Original-Received: from bridgekeeper.physik.uni-ulm.de (bridgekeeper.physik.uni-ulm.de [134.60.10.123]) by mail.uni-ulm.de (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k3KL3498010017; Thu, 20 Apr 2006 23:03:04 +0200 (MEST) Original-Received: by bridgekeeper.physik.uni-ulm.de (Postfix, from userid 170) id E5EBA1172D; Thu, 20 Apr 2006 23:03:03 +0200 (CEST) Original-To: Eli Zaretskii X-Face: 3Phac&+dw=IZHjhua]bp}LH<*p{qzj8u+ List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:53159 Archived-At: On Thu, Apr 20 2006, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> From: Reiner Steib [...] >> ,---- >> | Dumping under names emacs and emacs-22.0.50.1 >> | emacs:0:Pure Lisp storage overflow (approx. 2155304 bytes needed) >> | 5504 pure bytes used > > This has nothing to do with PURESIZE, it's the ridiculously low number > 5504 that is the problem. (Note that, on a 64-bit host, 2155304 is > well within the limits of BASE_PURESIZE enlarged by PURESIZE_RATIO.) > > How come you only have 5504 bytes of space in the pure[] array? Is > this during the first stage of bootstrap perhaps? It was in "make bootstrap". > If so, please look at the last "Dumping under names ..." message > near the end of the build, it's that one that's important. Now I've built again (without a bootstrap) and I got (there is only one "Dumping under names" in the logs): ,----[ 64 bit ] | Loading tooltip... | nil | Finding pointers to doc strings... | Finding pointers to doc strings...done | Dumping under names emacs and emacs-22.0.50.3 | emacs:0:Pure Lisp storage overflow (approx. 2155304 bytes needed) | 5504 pure bytes used | ./emacs -q -batch -f list-load-path-shadows `---- I also get the "Pure space overflow" warning from `fancy-splash-screens-1': ,----[ v pure-space-overflow RET ] | pure-space-overflow is a variable defined in `startup.el'. | Its value is t `---- ,----[ v pure-bytes-used RET ] | pure-bytes-used is a variable defined in `src/alloc.c'. | Its value is 5504 | | Documentation: | Number of bytes of sharable Lisp data allocated so far. `---- On a 32 bit host (same source tree) I get: ,----[ 32 bit ] | Dumping under names emacs and emacs-22.0.50.2 | emacs:0:Pure Lisp storage overflow (approx. 1343128 bytes needed) | 3616 pure bytes used `---- > (I imagine you already know that.) No, I didn't know. And I don't know why these numbers are so low on my machines. How can I investigate? Will it cause problems? Bye, Reiner. -- ,,, (o o) ---ooO-(_)-Ooo--- | PGP key available | http://rsteib.home.pages.de/