From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Reiner Steib Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Image DLLs for the Windows binary of Emacs 22.2 (was: Pretest 22.1.90) Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 20:55:34 +0100 Message-ID: References: <873asf5404.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <47A11D80.4050507@gnu.org> Reply-To: Reiner Steib NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1201809474 9429 80.91.229.12 (31 Jan 2008 19:57:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 19:57:54 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 31 20:58:14 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JKfY1-0002FP-Ar for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 31 Jan 2008 20:58:09 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JKfXa-0004fb-00 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 31 Jan 2008 14:57:42 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JKfWC-0003Xa-Ta for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Jan 2008 14:56:17 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JKfWB-0003WZ-2C for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Jan 2008 14:56:16 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JKfWA-0003WM-Jr for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Jan 2008 14:56:14 -0500 Original-Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2] helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JKfWA-0003YQ-7c for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Jan 2008 14:56:14 -0500 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1JKfW3-0005YK-EM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Jan 2008 19:56:07 +0000 Original-Received: from p54a949c3.dip.t-dialin.net ([84.169.73.195]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 31 Jan 2008 19:56:07 +0000 Original-Received: from Reiner.Steib by p54a949c3.dip.t-dialin.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 31 Jan 2008 19:56:07 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Lines: 50 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: p54a949c3.dip.t-dialin.net X-Face: P05mdcZT&lL[-s2=mw~RsllZ0zZAb?vdE}.s List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:87884 Archived-At: On Thu, Jan 31 2008, Jason Rumney wrote: > A Windows binary is available at > ftp://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/emacs/pretest/windows/emacs-22.1.90-bin-i386.zip [...] > In addition, libxpm.dll is bundled, [...] What about the DLLs for PNG, JPEG and other image formats? It would be great if you could include them as well. In the discussion in July 2007, Richard agreed to include them in the zip file, see the articles below: ,----[ ] | From: Richard Stallman | Subject: Re: bad tool-bar icons in Emacs 22.1 release | Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel | Date: 2007-07-01 00:30:33 GMT | | Probably it wasn't clear from the quoted context: The binaries on | don't include DLLs required to | display XPM (tool bar), PNG, JPEG and other images in Emacs. | | For convenience, let's put these libraries on the site. | We should distribute the source alongside the binaries, | and we should make sure that the binaries have whatever | notices are required by the licenses. `---- ,----[ ] | From: Jason Rumney | Subject: Re: bad tool-bar icons in Emacs 22.1 release | Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel | Date: 2007-07-02 23:30:53 GMT | | Richard Stallman wrote: | > Is not that a good argument for including them in the binaries then? | > | > It is an argument in favor of that. But people say that would be a pain | > for other reasons. So maybe this is the best compromise. | > | | I must have missed that mail - what was the pain? `---- Bye, Reiner. -- ,,, (o o) ---ooO-(_)-Ooo--- | PGP key available | http://rsteib.home.pages.de/