From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Reiner Steib Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Fontification in Gnus Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2005 00:19:59 +0100 Message-ID: References: <9993.1131326507@olgas.newt.com> <11770.1131655515@olgas.newt.com> Reply-To: Reiner Steib NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1131666519 26550 80.91.229.2 (10 Nov 2005 23:48:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 23:48:39 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 11 00:48:36 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EaM8h-00062i-Mb for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 11 Nov 2005 00:47:31 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EaM8g-0002rr-Vg for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 18:47:31 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EaM8X-0002rl-AT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 18:47:21 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EaM8V-0002rZ-Te for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 18:47:21 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EaM8V-0002rV-Pg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 18:47:19 -0500 Original-Received: from [134.60.1.1] (helo=mail.uni-ulm.de) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA:24) (Exim 4.34) id 1EaM8V-00024h-Oe for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 18:47:20 -0500 Original-Received: from bridgekeeper.physik.uni-ulm.de (bridgekeeper.physik.uni-ulm.de [134.60.10.123]) by mail.uni-ulm.de (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id jAANlE3O007844; Fri, 11 Nov 2005 00:47:15 +0100 (MET) Original-Received: from me (bridgekeeper.physik.uni-ulm.de [134.60.10.123]) by bridgekeeper.physik.uni-ulm.de (Postfix) with SMTP id 6108C10C78; Fri, 11 Nov 2005 00:47:13 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: (nullmailer pid 11619 invoked by uid 170); Thu, 10 Nov 2005 23:19:59 -0000 Original-To: Bill Wohler Mail-Followup-To: Bill Wohler , emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Face: P05mdcZT&lL[-s2=mw~RsllZ0zZAb?vdE}.s (Bill Wohler's message of "Thu, 10 Nov 2005 12:45:15 -0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-DCC-EATSERVER-Metrics: gemini 1166; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:45708 Archived-At: On Thu, Nov 10 2005, Bill Wohler wrote: > Reiner Steib wrote: >> With CVS Emacs you're using the bundled Gnus 5.11, I guess. With >> Emacs you're using some 5.10.x version. Which version is it exactly? > > With Emacs 21, I'm using the Debian Gnus package which is version > 5.10.6-1.NO.20051020-1. I'm puzzled about this version number. CVS snapshot from the stable branch (v5-10) maybe. Could you ask the Debian maintainer? If it's from the v5-10 branch there should be no significant differences compared to the version in Emacs CVS. I.e. the different behavior must be cause by differences between Emacs 21 and Emacs CVS. Else changes in Gnus might be responsible. Bye, Reiner. -- ,,, (o o) ---ooO-(_)-Ooo--- | PGP key available | http://rsteib.home.pages.de/