From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: "make autoloads" asks a question Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2011 17:15:26 -0500 Message-ID: References: <83pqqnu2hu.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1298154486 24556 80.91.229.12 (19 Feb 2011 22:28:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2011 22:28:06 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 19 23:28:02 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PqvHR-0005LD-Pc for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 19 Feb 2011 23:27:57 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45254 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Pqv5R-0000UF-HY for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 19 Feb 2011 17:15:33 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=53426 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Pqv5M-0000TZ-Nf for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Feb 2011 17:15:29 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pqv5L-0001FH-Ew for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Feb 2011 17:15:28 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:43481) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pqv5L-0001FD-DM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Feb 2011 17:15:27 -0500 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35124) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pqv5L-0005Xa-7D; Sat, 19 Feb 2011 17:15:27 -0500 X-Spook: encryption clones bomb red noise Bin Laden illuminati X-Ran: !BOn4lfY\LQx8$(xnht+n[RexI (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sat, 19 Feb 2011 23:40:45 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.10 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:136247 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii wrote: > Should batch-update-autoloads bind version-control to `never', to > avoid this? I think so. It only changes sections of the file that are auto-generated, so there is no need to keep the previous version. Stand-alone loaddefs files have version-control: never cookies.