From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juanma Barranquero Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs's handling of line numbers [from bug#5042] Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 10:45:47 +0200 Message-ID: References: <8339yucbsg.fsf@gnu.org> <83wrw5bxkc.fsf@gnu.org> <83tyr9bgid.fsf@gnu.org> <83r5mcbqzo.fsf@gnu.org> <87zl0v6hd3.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1271925996 32009 80.91.229.12 (22 Apr 2010 08:46:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 08:46:36 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: David Kastrup Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Apr 22 10:46:27 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O4s3D-0003By-QA for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 10:46:24 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53093 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1O4s3C-0000MH-QA for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 04:46:22 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1O4s37-0000Ly-Cv for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 04:46:17 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=59033 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1O4s35-0000LT-Py for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 04:46:16 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O4s30-0005AG-J4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 04:46:11 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-bw0-f225.google.com ([209.85.218.225]:64681) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O4s2z-00059i-So; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 04:46:10 -0400 Original-Received: by bwz25 with SMTP id 25so8155699bwz.8 for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 01:46:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:received:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=4KqXjY+CQQZN7daxIUPEXtnFDMGvRc0frdPLj+TQcVU=; b=fd5zLizWecUKAdmsg8pFKlmYLOOjk9tqSBgeSvFopPR1lfxmOTpt+lHoR97zzM5OgM sDXJNGV8CAvZaLlgUaZczdHJOhT+k/AVkg09aOhQD00PORuzbClW4h4w0KQq+AbL4q7+ EJIOFyUvvVh8lX489SRXUI31qCgr+LrocY6os= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=R5ghYJLhainbthtkuaAKeC4JWZ7XK0kb0XouyAwAK3cCGCtTHZxvgZrk8cChgnac+L LNdLS1owuHjDLSu6aUJLallHiqzKLq4NGRhlaXTTGUexaSf8VeT7zNio/46jfvXgy6WS VMic4S/x3/LmAGA095SAs9aZuSHS9kRDO3EBg= Original-Received: by 10.204.81.29 with HTTP; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 01:45:47 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87zl0v6hd3.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> Original-Received: by 10.204.82.230 with SMTP id c38mr517443bkl.213.1271925967133; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 01:46:07 -0700 (PDT) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:124020 Archived-At: On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 10:06, David Kastrup wrote: > I repeat my suggestion to let clone-indirect-buffer be able to clone > just part of a buffer. =C2=A0Using this for info nodes and tar subfiles w= ould > yield perfectly consistent behavior for the user without narrowing. I think this is a good idea, but orthogonal to the issue. I'd still like linum to number a region using the whole-buffer line numbers, for example. Juanma