From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.mail.mew.general Subject: Re: [mew-int 01585] Re: windows 1252 Date: 04 Nov 2003 07:55:07 +0200 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <20031031.213916.222075160.kazu@iijlab.net> <2719-Sat01Nov2003173635+0200-eliz@elta.co.il> <87llqzuvaj.fsf@tleepslib.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <20031104.111334.60445673.kazu@iijlab.net> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1067925284 17690 80.91.224.253 (4 Nov 2003 05:54:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2003 05:54:44 +0000 (UTC) Cc: mew-int@mew.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 04 06:54:42 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AGu9K-0004l4-00 for ; Tue, 04 Nov 2003 06:54:42 +0100 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AGu9J-0008Fg-00 for ; Tue, 04 Nov 2003 06:54:41 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AGu8q-0000fc-Uj for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Tue, 04 Nov 2003 00:54:12 -0500 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.24) id 1AGu8R-0000eM-Qt for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Nov 2003 00:53:47 -0500 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.24) id 1AGu7v-0000Dj-4P for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Nov 2003 00:53:46 -0500 Original-Received: from [207.232.27.5] (helo=WST0054) by monty-python.gnu.org with asmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AGu7t-00009d-Pz; Tue, 04 Nov 2003 00:53:14 -0500 Original-To: Kazu Yamamoto (=?iso-2022-jp?B?GyRCOzNLXE9CSScbKEI=?=) In-reply-to: <20031104.111334.60445673.kazu@iijlab.net> X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.2 Precedence: list List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:17674 gmane.mail.mew.general:512 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:17674 > Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2003 11:13:34 +0900 (JST) > From: Kazu Yamamoto (=?iso-2022-jp?B?GyRCOzNLXE9CSScbKEI=?=) > (2) Co-exist of Emacs and XEmacs. > > The 'emacs-mule coding-system is not appropriate since XEmacs > has a different internal representation from Emacs'one. Note > Emacsen use different 'emacs-mule coding-system among > versions. > > The one-and-only coding-system which, I found, meets the requirements > above is 'ctext. In that case, extending ctext to handle the problem we were discussing in this thread would not be a good idea: IIRC, XEmacs doesn't support extended segments, and non-MULE Emacsen certainly don't. Or am I missing something?