From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Bootstrap fails on w32 Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 22:16:25 +0300 Message-ID: References: <428FB183.3000209@student.lu.se> <4290EDA8.7020401@student.lu.se> <85psvjyli5.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <42932443.7030106@student.lu.se> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1116962534 30900 80.91.229.2 (24 May 2005 19:22:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 19:22:14 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, jasonr@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue May 24 21:22:12 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DaexA-0000QH-E0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 24 May 2005 21:20:36 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Daezy-0004rr-Ez for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 24 May 2005 15:23:30 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DaezT-0004kJ-Mz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 May 2005 15:22:59 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DaezL-0004fo-Tu for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 May 2005 15:22:52 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DaezL-0004eQ-OV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 May 2005 15:22:51 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.114.186.24] (helo=legolas.inter.net.il) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DaetX-0003wZ-Bj; Tue, 24 May 2005 15:16:51 -0400 Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-80-230-37-2.inter.net.il [80.230.37.2]) by legolas.inter.net.il (MOS 3.5.8-GR) with ESMTP id ELG18384 (AUTH halo1); Tue, 24 May 2005 22:16:18 +0300 (IDT) Original-To: Lennart Borgman In-reply-to: <42932443.7030106@student.lu.se> (message from Lennart Borgman on Tue, 24 May 2005 14:55:31 +0200) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:37576 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:37576 > Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 14:55:31 +0200 > From: Lennart Borgman > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > > As far as I understand it is the .bat files that are special. The > makefiles are not. AFAIK, yes and yes. > Why then not handle the .bat file separately? Can't > they be stored as binary files in the repository? Because we lose the diffs: CVS will not tell you differences between versions of files that are stored as binary.