From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: rms@gnu.org
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence
Date: Sun, 01 Apr 2007 00:44:35 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <uzm5t5br0.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1HXkP9-0003ZY-7X@fencepost.gnu.org> (message from Richard Stallman on Sat, 31 Mar 2007 16:42:31 -0400)
> From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
> Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2007 16:42:31 -0400
> Cc: lekktu@gmail.com, jasonr@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org, handa@m17n.org
>
> After all it's been there in one form or another since Emacs-20.
>
> That doesn't change anything.
Yes, it does: it tells us that the way things work now, they do the
job quite well, and that the problem which sparked this thread is a
marginal one which users are unlikely to bump into.
IOW, it should not hold the release.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-03-31 21:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 97+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-02-28 22:27 kbd vs read-key-sequence Juanma Barranquero
2007-02-28 22:40 ` Andreas Schwab
2007-02-28 22:50 ` Lennart Borgman (gmail)
2007-02-28 23:32 ` Juanma Barranquero
2007-03-01 1:35 ` Juanma Barranquero
2007-03-01 5:28 ` Stefan Monnier
2007-03-01 12:48 ` Juanma Barranquero
2007-03-01 15:32 ` Stefan Monnier
2007-03-01 17:30 ` Juanma Barranquero
2007-03-01 23:23 ` Stefan Monnier
2007-03-01 23:53 ` Juanma Barranquero
2007-03-02 0:03 ` Juanma Barranquero
2007-03-02 9:09 ` Jason Rumney
2007-03-02 9:48 ` Juanma Barranquero
2007-03-02 16:47 ` Stefan Monnier
2007-03-02 17:29 ` Juanma Barranquero
2007-03-02 17:57 ` Jason Rumney
2007-03-02 18:15 ` Juanma Barranquero
2007-03-02 18:20 ` David Kastrup
2007-03-02 21:03 ` Stefan Monnier
2007-03-03 0:31 ` Juanma Barranquero
2007-03-03 22:13 ` Richard Stallman
2007-03-03 23:01 ` Stefan Monnier
2007-03-05 2:55 ` Richard Stallman
2007-03-05 17:10 ` Stefan Monnier
2007-03-11 20:01 ` Richard Stallman
2007-03-12 15:19 ` Stefan Monnier
2007-03-13 1:17 ` Kenichi Handa
2007-03-13 3:12 ` Stefan Monnier
2007-03-13 4:06 ` Kenichi Handa
2007-03-13 14:47 ` Stefan Monnier
2007-03-19 5:14 ` Richard Stallman
2007-03-19 12:25 ` Kenichi Handa
2007-03-19 14:19 ` Kim F. Storm
2007-03-26 3:52 ` Richard Stallman
2007-03-26 7:22 ` Kenichi Handa
2007-03-26 23:14 ` Richard Stallman
2007-03-27 0:30 ` Kenichi Handa
2007-03-27 16:42 ` Richard Stallman
2007-03-28 0:29 ` Kenichi Handa
2007-03-29 15:32 ` Richard Stallman
2007-03-29 16:11 ` Stefan Monnier
2007-03-30 21:23 ` Richard Stallman
2007-03-31 0:38 ` Stefan Monnier
2007-03-31 10:07 ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-03-31 23:20 ` Richard Stallman
2007-04-01 3:09 ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-04-01 13:59 ` Richard Stallman
2007-04-01 19:14 ` Stefan Monnier
2007-04-01 20:18 ` Jason Rumney
2007-04-01 20:35 ` Stefan Monnier
2007-04-02 12:00 ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-04-02 2:27 ` Kenichi Handa
2007-04-02 11:58 ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-04-02 12:31 ` Kenichi Handa
2007-04-02 12:46 ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-04-02 14:33 ` Stefan Monnier
2007-04-02 16:14 ` Jason Rumney
2007-04-02 23:24 ` Davis Herring
2007-04-03 6:58 ` Jason Rumney
2007-04-03 7:46 ` Richard Stallman
2007-04-03 8:42 ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-04-03 14:58 ` Stefan Monnier
2007-04-03 15:34 ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-04-03 17:59 ` Stefan Monnier
2007-04-03 18:20 ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-04-03 18:33 ` Stefan Monnier
2007-04-04 14:02 ` Richard Stallman
2007-04-04 14:02 ` Richard Stallman
2007-04-03 9:05 ` Jason Rumney
2007-04-03 9:37 ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-04-03 10:24 ` Jason Rumney
2007-04-04 14:02 ` Richard Stallman
2007-04-03 10:12 ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-04-04 14:02 ` Richard Stallman
2007-04-04 18:03 ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-03-31 20:42 ` Richard Stallman
2007-03-31 21:44 ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2007-03-31 22:06 ` Juanma Barranquero
2007-03-30 0:47 ` Kenichi Handa
2007-03-30 3:25 ` Stefan Monnier
2007-03-31 10:03 ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-03-31 20:27 ` Stefan Monnier
2007-03-30 21:22 ` Richard Stallman
2007-03-31 10:02 ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-03-19 5:14 ` Richard Stallman
2007-03-26 23:14 ` Richard Stallman
2007-03-28 0:57 ` Stefan Monnier
2007-03-28 16:09 ` Richard Stallman
2007-03-28 19:52 ` Stefan Monnier
2007-03-29 17:59 ` Richard Stallman
2007-03-30 23:47 ` Chong Yidong
2007-03-31 9:08 ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-03-03 22:13 ` Richard Stallman
2007-03-02 18:21 ` Juanma Barranquero
2007-03-02 19:04 ` Jason Rumney
2007-03-03 10:39 ` Eli Zaretskii
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=uzm5t5br0.fsf@gnu.org \
--to=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=rms@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).