From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Feature freeze postphoned to end-July Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 06:07:56 +0300 Message-ID: References: <8763shtgz1.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <20080610164216.GA4844@muc.de> <87iqwgrmg9.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <874p7zr70v.fsf@stupidchicken.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1213240098 13087 80.91.229.12 (12 Jun 2008 03:08:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 03:08:18 +0000 (UTC) Cc: acm@muc.de, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Chong Yidong Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jun 12 05:09:01 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1K6dBM-0001W8-1s for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 12 Jun 2008 05:09:00 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44203 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1K6dAY-00008K-Hg for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 11 Jun 2008 23:08:10 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1K6dAQ-0008WH-5Q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Jun 2008 23:08:02 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1K6dAO-0008UX-91 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Jun 2008 23:08:01 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=38004 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1K6dAO-0008UN-2D for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Jun 2008 23:08:00 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout3.012.net.il ([84.95.2.7]:9908) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1K6dAN-0005v5-O5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Jun 2008 23:07:59 -0400 Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([80.230.28.131]) by i_mtaout3.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2004.12) with ESMTPA id <0K2B00C6CYQAOA60@i_mtaout3.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Jun 2008 06:22:59 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: <874p7zr70v.fsf@stupidchicken.com> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 9.1 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:98990 Archived-At: > From: Chong Yidong > Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 17:33:36 -0400 > Cc: acm@muc.de, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > >> > A few bugfixes, i.e. a more stable 22.x release to fill the gap until > >> > 23.1 is ready. > >> > >> I can't remember the last time a crash bug was reported/fixed in the > >> branch. > > > > ??? Since when the only bugs we care about are crashes? > > I guess we miscommunicated: you were talking about stability, which I > took to mean resistance to crashing. Ah, yes. Sorry about ambiguous wording.