From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: proced: ppid of process ID 0 can be 0 Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 06:09:53 +0200 Message-ID: References: <18765.19040.568030.246241@tfkp04.physik.uni-erlangen.de> <18765.29820.997276.703222@tfkp04.physik.uni-erlangen.de> <18765.51840.943986.608296@tfkp04.physik.uni-erlangen.de> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1229919006 17081 80.91.229.12 (22 Dec 2008 04:10:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 04:10:06 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Roland.Winkler@physik.uni-erlangen.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Juanma Barranquero Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Dec 22 05:11:11 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LEc8M-00037W-Qp for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 22 Dec 2008 05:11:11 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55275 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LEc7A-0007RW-80 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 21 Dec 2008 23:09:56 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LEc74-0007Oa-Sp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Dec 2008 23:09:50 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LEc74-0007NW-6q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Dec 2008 23:09:50 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=44183 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LEc74-0007Mz-1T for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Dec 2008 23:09:50 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout1.012.net.il ([84.95.2.1]:46957) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LEc73-0000Ki-KH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Dec 2008 23:09:49 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.i-mtaout1.012.net.il by i-mtaout1.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0KC900G00FJP9700@i-mtaout1.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Dec 2008 06:12:18 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.126.252.83]) by i-mtaout1.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0KC900L0MFOHPV30@i-mtaout1.012.net.il>; Mon, 22 Dec 2008 06:12:18 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 9.1 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:107169 Archived-At: > Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 22:26:15 +0100 > From: "Juanma Barranquero" > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, Roland Winkler > > OTOH, your approach can also be evaluated by weighting the > complexity it introduces (however small) against the uncleanliness > of adapting one current primitive to cater to expectations. I see no complexity at all. Please tell what is complex about another primitive.