From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: emacs snapshot tarball test build Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 22:45:20 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20070322151036.3000@henman-np.b-eng.it.to-be.co.jp> <20070328163249.4004@henman-np.b-eng.it.to-be.co.jp> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1175114764 3158 80.91.229.12 (28 Mar 2007 20:46:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 20:46:04 +0000 (UTC) Cc: henman@it.to-be.co.jp, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "djh" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 28 22:46:01 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HWf1s-0007ap-Ok for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 28 Mar 2007 22:46:01 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HWf4N-0000uH-PL for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 28 Mar 2007 15:48:35 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HWf3u-0000d8-Fj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Mar 2007 16:48:06 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HWf3i-0000Wa-FP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Mar 2007 16:48:02 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HWf3i-0000WT-7X for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Mar 2007 15:47:54 -0500 Original-Received: from romy.inter.net.il ([213.8.233.24]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HWf1C-0001ME-BO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Mar 2007 16:45:18 -0400 Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-84-228-251-235.inter.net.il [84.228.251.235]) by romy.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3-GA) with ESMTP id HMI90388 (AUTH halo1); Wed, 28 Mar 2007 22:45:17 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <20070328163249.4004@henman-np.b-eng.it.to-be.co.jp> X-detected-kernel: FreeBSD 4.7-5.2 (or MacOS X 10.2-10.4) (2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:68727 Archived-At: > Cc: "djh" , > From: "djh" > Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 16:32:49 +0900 > > > > The only problem is shown below (and maybe it is not a real problem). > > > -------- > > > ../src/emacs -batch --no-site-file --multibyte -l /usr/src/emacs-tmp/emacs-22.0.95/lib-src/../lisp/mail/blessmail.el > > > Fatal error (6)make[1]: *** [blessmail] Aborted (core dumped) > > > > To me, this looks as an evidence that the Emacs binary you built is > > unreliable. So I think we should not yet add GCC 4.1.3 to the the 3 > > safe versions of Cygwin GCC mentioned in PROBLEMS. > > GCC 4.1.3 (actually gcc-core-4.1-20070312.tar.bz2 and friends) does provide for a > robust build from cvs though (or did on March 13th anyway.) How can you call it ``robust'' when it crashes while loading blessmail?