From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: newsticker-*.el files Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2008 17:25:13 +0300 Message-ID: References: <200806082201.m58M142d000380@sallyv1.ics.uci.edu> <200806091243.m59ChCUb022457@sallyv1.ics.uci.edu> <86r6b66aie.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1213021627 4171 80.91.229.12 (9 Jun 2008 14:27:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2008 14:27:07 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ulf.jasper@web.de, dann@ics.uci.edu, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: David Kastrup Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jun 09 16:27:49 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1K5iLa-0005rL-Tz for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 09 Jun 2008 16:27:47 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55812 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1K5iKn-0000tn-KH for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 09 Jun 2008 10:26:57 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1K5iKA-0000VW-KQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Jun 2008 10:26:18 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1K5iK8-0000Ug-8e for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Jun 2008 10:26:18 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=39497 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1K5iK7-0000UY-Ue for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Jun 2008 10:26:15 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout5.012.net.il ([84.95.2.13]:61723) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1K5iK4-0002iK-90; Mon, 09 Jun 2008 10:26:12 -0400 Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([80.230.28.131]) by i_mtaout5.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2004.12) with ESMTPA id <0K27007IHA31N8L3@i_mtaout5.012.net.il>; Mon, 09 Jun 2008 17:40:14 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: <86r6b66aie.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 9.1 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:98804 Archived-At: > From: David Kastrup > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , ulf.jasper@web.de, Stefan Monnier , emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2008 14:47:05 +0200 > > I think it quite more likely if there are any DOS machines used for > development that getting sshd on them to work and visiting them via > Tramp will be less work than Emacs. I reckon this is joke, because DOS doesn't even have an IP stack, not to mention the fact that it's a single-process system and thus cannot support daemons of the sshd kind. So making sshd work on DOS would be a major project, indeed.