From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Cheng Gao Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Is it planned to remove xemacs compatibility code? Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 14:29:20 +0800 Organization: eqiao.com Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <87d5z5wau8.fsf@vh213602.truman.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=gb2312 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1098858607 27922 80.91.229.6 (27 Oct 2004 06:30:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 06:30:07 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Oct 27 08:29:55 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CMhJj-0000re-00 for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 08:29:55 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CMhRS-0003KD-RR for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 02:37:54 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CMhRL-0003K7-4t for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 02:37:47 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CMhRK-0003Jt-Nl for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 02:37:46 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CMhRI-0003Jh-90 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 02:37:46 -0400 Original-Received: from [80.91.229.2] (helo=main.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CMhJO-0001yS-QK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 02:29:35 -0400 Original-Received: from list by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CMhJO-0004xN-00 for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 08:29:34 +0200 Original-Received: from 218.2.142.138 ([218.2.142.138]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 08:29:34 +0200 Original-Received: from chenggao by 218.2.142.138 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 08:29:34 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Lines: 24 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 218.2.142.138 User-Agent: Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) Emacs/21.3.50 (windows-nt) Cancel-Lock: sha1:Vsf+6lPgAPD6x0NICGnECrv6Wb8= X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:29022 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:29022 ,---- | What about the files that aren't distributed separately? `---- This is what I wonder. For example, "url" package is absorbed in Emacs, and I dont think it's expected to maintain a Xemacs compatible version by Emacs developers. For example, in lisp/term.el, with (term-if-xemacs ... (term-ifnot-xemacs ... all around is really *interesting*, specially term-ifnot-xemacs makes me nervous. After all, it's a Emacs-bundled file. Maybe I am too paranoid. -- 我有数行泪 不落十余年 今日为君尽 并洒秋风前