From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: GC (was: lists.texi) Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2005 16:45:05 +0200 Message-ID: References: <200506182319.j5INJWF08937@raven.dms.auburn.edu> <200506202312.j5KNCct19091@raven.dms.auburn.edu> <200506212058.j5LKw5P23961@raven.dms.auburn.edu> <874qbqh0lm.fsf@jurta.org> <87mzpf3a5v.fsf_-_@jurta.org> <87y88zv3vm.fsf@jurta.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1119708163 29202 80.91.229.2 (25 Jun 2005 14:02:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2005 14:02:43 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jun 25 16:02:35 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DmBEn-0006JN-Ik for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 25 Jun 2005 16:02:25 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DmBM2-0005OF-Oi for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 25 Jun 2005 10:09:54 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DmBBt-0001RZ-Cv for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Jun 2005 09:59:28 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DmBBg-0001JC-6F for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Jun 2005 09:59:12 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DmBBf-0001Dj-Re for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Jun 2005 09:59:11 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.114.186.24] (helo=legolas.inter.net.il) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DmB1r-0004ZJ-3I; Sat, 25 Jun 2005 09:49:03 -0400 Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-80-230-158-88.inter.net.il [80.230.158.88]) by legolas.inter.net.il (MOS 3.5.8-GR) with ESMTP id ESG30823 (AUTH halo1); Sat, 25 Jun 2005 16:45:08 +0300 (IDT) Original-To: miles@gnu.org In-reply-to: (message from Miles Bader on Sat, 25 Jun 2005 21:15:19 +0900) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:39500 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:39500 > Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2005 21:15:19 +0900 > From: Miles Bader > Cc: Juri Linkov , emacs-devel@gnu.org > > Getting that number is system-dependent of course, but there seems no > reason not to do it on systems where someone wants to write the code > (it can even be done in lisp on linux, by reading /proc/meminfo). I'd say we should add a primitive to get the amount of available memory.