From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: single init file/directory for windows and linux using version
 control svn or cvs
Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 13:26:58 +0300
Message-ID: <uwt7ulvyl.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <eeptb6$8tq$1@sea.gmane.org> <E1GQDpw-0003K0-EY@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<m2mz8to2pz.fsf@eqiao.com> <45128250.8090009@gnu.org>
	<E1GQUxA-0000eU-Gg@fencepost.gnu.org> <ufyekm5xu.fsf@gnu.org>
	<E1GQyHv-0005YV-3g@fencepost.gnu.org>
Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1159007244 25586 80.91.229.2 (23 Sep 2006 10:27:24 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 10:27:24 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, jasonr@gnu.org, chenggao@gmail.com
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Sep 23 12:27:23 2006
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GR4j2-0007Gk-Qe
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 23 Sep 2006 12:27:13 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GR4j2-0002Go-4Z
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 23 Sep 2006 06:27:12 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GR4is-0002Gj-VN
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Sep 2006 06:27:02 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GR4ir-0002Do-IM
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Sep 2006 06:27:02 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GR4ir-0002DZ-CP
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Sep 2006 06:27:01 -0400
Original-Received: from [192.114.186.20] (helo=nitzan.inter.net.il)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52)
	id 1GR4ml-0006SH-VQ; Sat, 23 Sep 2006 06:31:04 -0400
Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-84-228-212-11.inter.net.il
	[84.228.212.11]) by nitzan.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3-GA)
	with ESMTP id ESO04127 (AUTH halo1);
	Sat, 23 Sep 2006 13:26:57 +0300 (IDT)
Original-To: rms@gnu.org
In-reply-to: <E1GQyHv-0005YV-3g@fencepost.gnu.org> (message from Richard
	Stallman on Fri, 22 Sep 2006 23:34:47 -0400)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:60133
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/60133>

> From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
> CC: chenggao@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org, jasonr@gnu.org
> Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 23:34:47 -0400
> 
> His argument leads to the conclusion that it might be acceptable not
> to check C:\.emacs.d\; that not checking it is not be a bug.
> 
> So we don't have to do this.  But wouldn't it be a good idea anyway?
> That would be more consistent and natural behavior.

I'm not sure it's worth the hassle, but if someone has time to write
the code, I don't see a reason not to accept it.