From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs 23.0 is much slower starting than Emacs 22.3 Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 11:57:46 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20081022091136.GB924@muc.de> <20081022151444.GE924@muc.de> <48FF58FB.6000302@harpegolden.net> <20081022211202.GA1037@muc.de> <49001F5A.7040402@harpegolden.net> <20081023090908.GB2666@muc.de> <4900ACF9.7060501@harpegolden.net> <4900FF17.2000203@harpegolden.net> <49011336.10307@harpegolden.net> <4901287F.3000203@harpegolden.net> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1224842359 4094 80.91.229.12 (24 Oct 2008 09:59:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 09:59:19 +0000 (UTC) Cc: acm@muc.de, lennart.borgman@gmail.com, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: David De La Harpe Golden Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Oct 24 12:00:19 2008 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KtJSr-0004vH-TV for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 24 Oct 2008 12:00:18 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57493 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KtJRm-0004sr-9k for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 24 Oct 2008 05:59:10 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KtJRf-0004sm-Ad for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Oct 2008 05:59:03 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KtJRe-0004sY-2p for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Oct 2008 05:59:02 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=34198 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KtJRd-0004sV-RV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Oct 2008 05:59:01 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout6.012.net.il ([84.95.2.16]:28759) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KtJRd-0005ry-OS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Oct 2008 05:59:01 -0400 Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.126.233.32]) by i-mtaout6.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0K9800JU7MET8LA0@i-mtaout6.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Oct 2008 11:59:18 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <4901287F.3000203@harpegolden.net> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (1203?) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:104939 Archived-At: > Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 02:44:31 +0100 > From: David De La Harpe Golden > CC: acm@muc.de, Eli Zaretskii , monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, > emacs-devel@gnu.org > > David De La Harpe Golden wrote: > > > > +++ Which leaves set-auto-mode... > > Which seems to be mostly the particular mode - So of course, this can > presumably vary wildly from mode to mode, but let's take c-mode (seeing > as it's for the c files I was testing with): > > set-auto-mode->set-auto-mode-0-> > c-mode-> (c-init-language-vars-for, > c-common-init->(c-basic-common-init, > run some internal hooks, like the "neutralize"), ...) > > See existing c-neutralize-syntax-in-CPP initial comment: > "SPEED _MATTERS_ IN THIS FUNCTION!!!" > > Profiling confirms - yes, it does. :-) How does this compare with Emacs 22?