From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Peter Lee Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Slow access to files using UNC path Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 08:22:01 -0500 Organization: ~ Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <1089978045.7826.200489429@webmail.messagingengine.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1089984436 1072 80.91.224.253 (16 Jul 2004 13:27:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 13:27:16 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Fri Jul 16 15:26:57 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BlSjo-0006vf-00 for ; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 15:26:56 +0200 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BlSjo-0007n7-00 for ; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 15:26:56 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1BlSmK-00049i-Un for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 09:29:32 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1BlSmA-00047C-JY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 09:29:22 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1BlSm8-00046b-0j for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 09:29:22 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1BlSm7-00046R-RR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 09:29:19 -0400 Original-Received: from [80.91.224.249] (helo=main.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BlSjW-0007DA-6R for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 09:26:38 -0400 Original-Received: from list by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BlSjV-0001bJ-00 for ; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 15:26:37 +0200 Original-Received: from 216.62.199.5 ([216.62.199.5]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 15:26:37 +0200 Original-Received: from pete_lee by 216.62.199.5 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 15:26:37 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Lines: 10 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 216.62.199.5 User-Agent: Gnus/5.110002 (No Gnus v0.2) Emacs/21.3.50 (windows-nt) Cancel-Lock: sha1:SOGKJQlfl6V2P3/B+TO/8PyuzEE= X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:25760 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:25760 >>>> Dhruva Krishnamurthy writes: Dhruva> Hello, I find accessing a file using UNC path using GNU Dhruva> Emacs (CVS Head, W2K and MinGW32 build) very slow when Dhruva> compared to XEmacs. Has anyone experienced the same and Dhruva> explored the reason? I'm using mingw32 cvs build on XP and UNC access is very fast. No different actually than any other application. Does it happen if you start without an init file '-Q'?