From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Another menu question - <cut>, <copy> and <paste>
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 06:40:12 +0200
Message-ID: <uu0jjdrgz.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <42C066BE.6010800@student.lu.se> <uwtofe87l.fsf@gnu.org>
	<42C07B6F.8060208@student.lu.se>
Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1119929929 14795 80.91.229.2 (28 Jun 2005 03:38:49 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 03:38:49 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jun 28 05:38:42 2005
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Dn6vo-0001Mn-4b
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 28 Jun 2005 05:38:40 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Dn73Z-0007E7-JU
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 27 Jun 2005 23:46:41 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Dn732-00070z-C1
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Jun 2005 23:46:08 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Dn72w-0006wn-Ot
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Jun 2005 23:46:04 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Dn72v-0006o4-Si
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Jun 2005 23:46:01 -0400
Original-Received: from [192.114.186.24] (helo=legolas.inter.net.il)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Dn71g-0000it-00
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Jun 2005 23:44:44 -0400
Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-80-230-84-173.inter.net.il
	[80.230.84.173]) by legolas.inter.net.il (MOS 3.5.8-GR)
	with ESMTP id ESU21618 (AUTH halo1);
	Tue, 28 Jun 2005 06:40:12 +0300 (IDT)
Original-To: Lennart Borgman <lennart.borgman.073@student.lu.se>
In-reply-to: <42C07B6F.8060208@student.lu.se> (message from Lennart Borgman on
	Tue, 28 Jun 2005 00:19:27 +0200)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:39724
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:39724

> Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 00:19:27 +0200
> From: Lennart Borgman <lennart.borgman.073@student.lu.se>
> CC: emacs-devel@gnu.org
> 
> Those names in the menus are not helpful to me at least. If there are 
> some keyboard keys on some computers named like that and Emacs uses 
> appropriate key bindings for those, why do they have to appear in the 
> menus?

Because the code that generates the menus works like that.  I think it
takes the last key binding for the function and displays that.
Perhaps if we reverse the order of key bindings, we will get a better
result (F20).

> Is not those C-w (and what more???) better candidates?

But C-w invokes a different function.