* Re: /srv/bzr/emacs/trunk r107222: Document url-queue-retrieve
[not found] ` <87bop6oje3.fsf@gnus.org>
@ 2012-02-10 17:25 ` Glenn Morris
2012-02-10 17:28 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2012-02-10 19:11 ` Stefan Monnier
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Glenn Morris @ 2012-02-10 17:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: emacs-devel; +Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen
Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote:
>> +This is like `url-retrieve' (which see for details of the arguments),
>> +but downloads in parallel. The variable `url-queue-parallel-processes'
>> +sets the number of concurrent processes. The variable `url-queue-timeout'
>> +sets a timeout."
>
> The main difference between the functions is that -queue lets you
> control the level of parallelism, which `url-retrieve' doesn't.
> `url-retrieve' is more parallel than `url-retrieve-queue', so this isn't
> a totally helpful doc string...
Sorry; I was misled by the fact that the word "parallel" appears nowhere
outside of url-queue.el.
PS could we curb this trend of following up on the diffs list?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* Re: /srv/bzr/emacs/trunk r107222: Document url-queue-retrieve
2012-02-10 17:25 ` /srv/bzr/emacs/trunk r107222: Document url-queue-retrieve Glenn Morris
@ 2012-02-10 17:28 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2012-02-10 17:39 ` Glenn Morris
2012-02-10 19:11 ` Stefan Monnier
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Lars Ingebrigtsen @ 2012-02-10 17:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Glenn Morris; +Cc: emacs-devel
Glenn Morris <rgm@gnu.org> writes:
> PS could we curb this trend of following up on the diffs list?
Does it matter much whether we discuss on the diff list or emacs-devel?
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no * Sent from my Rome
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: /srv/bzr/emacs/trunk r107222: Document url-queue-retrieve
2012-02-10 17:28 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
@ 2012-02-10 17:39 ` Glenn Morris
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Glenn Morris @ 2012-02-10 17:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Lars Ingebrigtsen; +Cc: emacs-devel
Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote:
> Does it matter much whether we discuss on the diff list or emacs-devel?
Not a huge amount, but I never expect to see discussion on the diffs
list. Eg I'm never going to search the archives to see if something was
discussed before, whereas I do with emacs-devel. I would configure the
diffs list to reject postings not originating from Savannah, but it may
not be possible.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: /srv/bzr/emacs/trunk r107222: Document url-queue-retrieve
2012-02-10 17:25 ` /srv/bzr/emacs/trunk r107222: Document url-queue-retrieve Glenn Morris
2012-02-10 17:28 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
@ 2012-02-10 19:11 ` Stefan Monnier
2012-02-13 22:57 ` Glenn Morris
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Monnier @ 2012-02-10 19:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Glenn Morris; +Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen, emacs-devel
> PS could we curb this trend of following up on the diffs list?
That would be good, yes. I don't think it's a terrible problem, but we
shouldn't post to *-diffs. I do post occasionally, but always
by mistake.
For the elpa-diffs list, I've set the dreaded Reply-To to emacs-devel,
but it seems this was not done in the emacs-diffs. I'm not sure
Reply-To: is the right approach (when replying to those messages,
I most often only want to reply to the sender rather than to
emacs-devel).
I guess we could otherwise set a spam filter that rejects message with
"Subject: Re:".
Stefan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* Re: /srv/bzr/emacs/trunk r107222: Document url-queue-retrieve
2012-02-10 19:11 ` Stefan Monnier
@ 2012-02-13 22:57 ` Glenn Morris
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Glenn Morris @ 2012-02-13 22:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stefan Monnier; +Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen, emacs-devel
Stefan Monnier wrote:
> For the elpa-diffs list, I've set the dreaded Reply-To to emacs-devel,
> but it seems this was not done in the emacs-diffs. I'm not sure
> Reply-To: is the right approach (when replying to those messages,
> I most often only want to reply to the sender rather than to
> emacs-devel).
If the problem is people replying without looking where their replies
are going, and if people want to send private replies most of the time,
then setting reply-to: emacs-devel will make things worse than they are
now.
> I guess we could otherwise set a spam filter that rejects message with
> "Subject: Re:".
Maybe couldn't hurt. Might just turn all discussions into private ones
though.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-02-13 22:57 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <E1RvhvA-0007Gw-4a@vcs.savannah.gnu.org>
[not found] ` <87bop6oje3.fsf@gnus.org>
2012-02-10 17:25 ` /srv/bzr/emacs/trunk r107222: Document url-queue-retrieve Glenn Morris
2012-02-10 17:28 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2012-02-10 17:39 ` Glenn Morris
2012-02-10 19:11 ` Stefan Monnier
2012-02-13 22:57 ` Glenn Morris
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).