From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Removing MULTI_KBOARD Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 16:54:08 +0300 Message-ID: References: <200807310343.m6V3h1Zo006813@sallyv1.ics.uci.edu> <200807311921.m6VJLxu1016770@sallyv1.ics.uci.edu> <200808011209.m71C9Tj3018356@sallyv1.ics.uci.edu> <200808011341.m71DfK6u015253@sallyv1.ics.uci.edu> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1217598891 17309 80.91.229.12 (1 Aug 2008 13:54:51 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 13:54:51 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Dan Nicolaescu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Aug 01 15:55:41 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KOv66-0007Ff-7D for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 01 Aug 2008 15:55:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55944 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KOv5B-0005Np-RO for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 01 Aug 2008 09:54:13 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KOv56-0005NK-PP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Aug 2008 09:54:08 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KOv55-0005Mq-T4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Aug 2008 09:54:08 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=59196 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KOv55-0005Mm-PW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Aug 2008 09:54:07 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout3.012.net.il ([84.95.2.7]:19453) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KOv55-0008Rc-9k for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Aug 2008 09:54:07 -0400 Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.229.228.238]) by i_mtaout3.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2004.12) with ESMTPA id <0K4X009A3DAFJB01@i_mtaout3.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Aug 2008 16:54:16 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: <200808011341.m71DfK6u015253@sallyv1.ics.uci.edu> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 9.1 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:101885 Archived-At: > From: Dan Nicolaescu > Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 06:41:20 -0700 > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > > From: Dan Nicolaescu > > > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > > > Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 05:09:29 -0700 > > > > > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > > > > > did we agree to remove MULTI_KBOARD or didn't we? > > > > > > Why? > > > > Because if it was discussed and I missed that, or by my silence let it > > look like I don't object, I have only myself to blame and will need to > > live with the results. If not, then there are other options. > > > > But basically, I don't understand why a simple question cannot be > > answered without further ado. Is something wrong with how I asked it? > > Yes, big time. Apologies. Anyway, does anyone else know if this was discussed, and if so, can point me to the relevant thread? TIA