From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: C-x C-b and C-x C-f bugging about confirmation Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 22:09:42 +0200 Message-ID: References: <1227274391.618443.2559.nullmailer@null> <1227353165.501338.3377.nullmailer@null> <87bpw6vcm3.fsf@jurta.org> <87abbqmu7u.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <87y6z9k8cj.fsf@cyd.mit.edu> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1227643809 27233 80.91.229.12 (25 Nov 2008 20:10:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 20:10:09 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Miles Bader Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 25 21:11:12 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1L54Fb-0005ni-QT for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 25 Nov 2008 21:11:12 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54306 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1L54ES-000863-6e for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 25 Nov 2008 15:10:00 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1L54EO-00085s-8C for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Nov 2008 15:09:56 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1L54EN-00085a-Gn for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Nov 2008 15:09:55 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=52295 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1L54EN-00085X-0N for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Nov 2008 15:09:55 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout7.012.net.il ([84.95.2.19]:10925) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1L54EL-0000F9-9P; Tue, 25 Nov 2008 15:09:53 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.i-mtaout7.012.net.il by i-mtaout7.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0KAW00900NZWPI00@i-mtaout7.012.net.il>; Tue, 25 Nov 2008 22:11:41 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.127.129.178]) by i-mtaout7.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0KAW00L0OO3GT740@i-mtaout7.012.net.il>; Tue, 25 Nov 2008 22:11:40 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (1203?) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:106167 Archived-At: > From: Miles Bader > Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 13:03:54 +0900 > Cc: Juri Linkov , ams@gnu.org, > Stefan Monnier , emacs-devel@gnu.org > > I have a few of my own custom completion commands which I'd like to be > treated like`minibuffer-complete' for purposes of confirmation; any > objections to the following additional patch? Are we going to continue to add new features, the freeze notwithstanding? If nothing else, this is a stab in the back of the manual updating job, that is under way for at least two or three weeks.