From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: buffer-swap-text and multibyteness Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 06:01:05 +0200 Message-ID: References: Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1234324893 12269 80.91.229.12 (11 Feb 2009 04:01:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 04:01:33 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, rms@gnu.org, handa@m17n.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 11 05:02:48 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LX6J9-000168-Ho for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 11 Feb 2009 05:02:44 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44759 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LX6Hp-0003t1-VM for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2009 23:01:21 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LX6Hm-0003sd-10 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2009 23:01:18 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LX6Hk-0003sQ-AT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2009 23:01:16 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=38274 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LX6Hk-0003sN-4k for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2009 23:01:16 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout6.012.net.il ([84.95.2.16]:36233) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LX6He-0003h6-Nc; Tue, 10 Feb 2009 23:01:10 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.i-mtaout6.012.net.il by i-mtaout6.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0KEV00A00UT8MI00@i-mtaout6.012.net.il>; Wed, 11 Feb 2009 06:01:33 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.126.128.7]) by i-mtaout6.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0KEV00J9BV6KCA80@i-mtaout6.012.net.il>; Wed, 11 Feb 2009 06:01:33 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (1203?) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:108976 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Monnier > Cc: handa@m17n.org, rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 16:57:26 -0500 > > >> >> In my poiunt of view, the way "edit" should work is that it should > >> >> basically be put into `message-mode' and then "saving" would simply > >> >> encode the whole message (as if preparing to send it). > >> > I'm not sure this isn't an overkill. > >> > >> Not sure why you'd think so. > > > When did you last look at the code you were describing? It does a lot > > more then just encode the message and add/rewrite the Content-Type > > headers. > > But... why do you think this "a lot more" is not needed/useful in the > case of rmailedit? Because rmailedit never sends any message, so it does not need most of that stuff.