From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: [drew.adams@oracle.com: RE: file-cache doc should state that the
	cache is non-persistent]
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 14:06:39 +0200
Message-ID: <uslp2bwog.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <E1FO0E8-000787-HE@fencepost.gnu.org>
Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1143547619 19662 80.91.229.2 (28 Mar 2006 12:06:59 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 12:06:59 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 28 14:06:58 2006
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FOCyL-0004uJ-2i
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 28 Mar 2006 14:06:53 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FOCyK-0005I9-BR
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 28 Mar 2006 07:06:52 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FOCy8-0005I2-Ra
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Mar 2006 07:06:40 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FOCy7-0005Hi-AI
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Mar 2006 07:06:40 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FOCy7-0005Hc-7l
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Mar 2006 07:06:39 -0500
Original-Received: from [192.114.186.66] (helo=romy.inter.net.il)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52)
	id 1FOCzp-0003iI-1M; Tue, 28 Mar 2006 07:08:25 -0500
Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-80-230-34-33.inter.net.il [80.230.34.33])
	by romy.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3-GA)
	with ESMTP id DVS14008 (AUTH halo1);
	Tue, 28 Mar 2006 14:06:35 +0200 (IST)
Original-To: rms@gnu.org
In-reply-to: <E1FO0E8-000787-HE@fencepost.gnu.org> (message from Richard
	Stallman on Mon, 27 Mar 2006 17:30:20 -0500)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:52154
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/52154>

> From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
> Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2006 17:30:20 -0500
> 
> Could someone who understands this please DTRT
> then ack this message?

Done.  (The cache is not persistent, the manual now says that
explicitly.)

Btw, should we merge the "File Name Cache" section with the following
one, "File Convenience"?  They are both short, and the file cache is
certainly a convenience feature of the kind described in the latter
section.