From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: PURESIZE increased (again)
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 08:35:25 +0300
Message-ID: <uslnyfejm.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <ur73yyp4g.fsf@gnu.org> <87lku5u6tx.fsf@pacem.orebokech.com>
	<jek69pogzf.fsf@sykes.suse.de> <umzelzcbg.fsf@gnu.org>
	<v9ejzsb36t.fsf@marauder.physik.uni-ulm.de> <uwtdkulm9.fsf@gnu.org>
	<v9odyw2c54.fsf@marauder.physik.uni-ulm.de> <ulktzv07f.fsf@gnu.org>
	<v9fyk0o38r.fsf@marauder.physik.uni-ulm.de> <u1wvihhya.fsf@gnu.org>
	<v964ku8yyr.fsf@marauder.physik.uni-ulm.de>
Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1146202541 24675 80.91.229.2 (28 Apr 2006 05:35:41 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 05:35:41 +0000 (UTC)
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Apr 28 07:35:37 2006
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FZLdd-0005zp-9l
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 28 Apr 2006 07:35:33 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FZLdc-0000kf-OV
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 28 Apr 2006 01:35:32 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FZLdP-0000kJ-Pj
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Apr 2006 01:35:19 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FZLdO-0000jf-BP
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Apr 2006 01:35:19 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FZLdO-0000jc-3u
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Apr 2006 01:35:18 -0400
Original-Received: from [192.114.186.66] (helo=romy.inter.net.il)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FZLgS-0002Ga-Aq
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Apr 2006 01:38:28 -0400
Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-83-130-215-212.inter.net.il
	[83.130.215.212]) by romy.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3-GA)
	with ESMTP id EBL95102 (AUTH halo1);
	Fri, 28 Apr 2006 08:35:16 +0300 (IDT)
Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org
In-reply-to: <v964ku8yyr.fsf@marauder.physik.uni-ulm.de> (message from Reiner
	Steib on Thu, 27 Apr 2006 23:56:12 +0200)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:53540
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/53540>

> From: Reiner Steib <reinersteib+gmane@imap.cc>
> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
> Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 23:56:12 +0200
> 
> I've set MYCPPFLAGS='-DENABLE_CHECKING=1'.

I don't think this should matter, as it only activates some assertions
in the C code.

> I use the same source tree for x86_64 and i686 with different
> exec-prefix:
> 
>   configure --prefix=[...]/HEAD --with-gtk \
>     --exec-prefix=[...]/HEAD-`uname -m`

But you do compile in two different directories for each architecture,
right?  That is, the source tree is common, but the build directories
are different, yes?  Or do you use the same directory, but clean it up
between any two builds?  If the latter, how do you clean it?

> I have some (minor, IMHO) local changes.  I will try tomorrow without
> any local changes and report back again.

Thanks.