From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@elta.co.il>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: savannah Emacs page
Date: 03 Feb 2004 08:23:15 +0200
Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org
Message-ID: <ur7xcisvg.fsf@elta.co.il>
References: <jwvfzdtfcv1.fsf-monnier+emacs/devel@asado.iro.umontreal.ca>
	<877jz518k6.fsf@marant.org>
Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@elta.co.il>
NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1075789505 21324 80.91.224.253 (3 Feb 2004 06:25:05 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2004 06:25:05 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 03 07:25:01 2004
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244])
	by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1AntzZ-0005yJ-00
	for <emacs-devel@deer.gmane.org>; Tue, 03 Feb 2004 07:25:01 +0100
Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173])
	by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1AntzZ-0006VN-00
	for <emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org>; Tue, 03 Feb 2004 07:25:01 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.24)
	id 1Antwq-0003CM-9n
	for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Tue, 03 Feb 2004 01:22:12 -0500
Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.24)
	id 1Antwl-0003C3-NU
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Feb 2004 01:22:07 -0500
Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.24)
	id 1AntwF-0002zz-6M
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Feb 2004 01:22:06 -0500
Original-Received: from [207.232.27.5] (helo=WST0054)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with asmtp (Exim 4.24)
	id 1AntwE-0002zs-Ki; Tue, 03 Feb 2004 01:21:35 -0500
Original-To: jmarant@nerim.net (=?iso-8859-15?q?J=E9r=F4me_Marant?=)
In-reply-to: <877jz518k6.fsf@marant.org> (jmarant@nerim.net)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.2
Precedence: list
List-Id: Emacs development discussions.  <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:19678
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:19678

> From: jmarant@nerim.net (=?iso-8859-15?q?J=E9r=F4me_Marant?=)
> Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2004 22:21:45 +0100
> 
> What about those posted to emacs-pretest-bug? Does someone pay
> attention to them or it is a wrong place to post patches?

emacs-pretest-bug is read by the core Emacs maintainers.  So yes,
someone does pay attention to them.  It is IMHO marginally better to
post patches (as opposed to bug reports in pretest and CVS versions)
to emacs-devel, since the latter is read by a much larger group of
people.