From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jason Rumney Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Some findings and suggestion about Emacs on w32 Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2004 18:44:46 +0100 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <008d01c4b886$32d07ff0$0200a8c0@sedrcw11488> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1098553541 19317 80.91.229.6 (23 Oct 2004 17:45:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2004 17:45:41 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guy@wyrdrune.com, Lennart Borgman , emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Oct 23 19:45:32 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CLPxL-0002aG-00 for ; Sat, 23 Oct 2004 19:45:31 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CLQ4t-0002RM-Qt for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 23 Oct 2004 13:53:19 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CLQ4k-0002Pk-93 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Oct 2004 13:53:10 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CLQ4j-0002P8-AD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Oct 2004 13:53:09 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CLQ4j-0002Or-7L for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Oct 2004 13:53:09 -0400 Original-Received: from [194.106.33.237] (helo=outmail.freedom2surf.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 4.34) id 1CLPws-0006DR-QP; Sat, 23 Oct 2004 13:45:03 -0400 Original-Received: from wanchan.jasonrumney.net (i-195-137-77-250.freedom2surf.net [195.137.77.250]) by outmail.freedom2surf.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i9NHj1nF016805; Sat, 23 Oct 2004 18:45:01 +0100 Original-Received: from TONKOTSU-RAMEN (tonkotsu-ramen.jasonrumney.net [10.0.0.28]) by wanchan.jasonrumney.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 751ECDDD16; Sat, 23 Oct 2004 18:44:59 +0100 (BST) Original-To: rms@gnu.org In-Reply-To: (Richard Stallman's message of "Sat, 23 Oct 2004 09:54:52 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/21.3.50 (windows-nt) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:28792 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:28792 Richard Stallman writes: > We could consider merging gnuserv into Emacs. That is not a trivial > decision. Why do you think this is desirable to do? I seem to recall we considered it about 2 years ago. We managed to get most, but not all papers for it. In the meantime, the extra features that gnuclient/gnuserv has were added to emacsclient/emacsserver, so there was no need to pusue it further, except for Windows where gnuserv has been ported, but emacsserver has not. But it is probably just as easy to make emacsserver/emacsclient work on Windows as it would be to replace the parts of gnuserv that we cannot get papers for.