From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: differ in signdness warnings.
Date: Sat, 03 Dec 2005 18:07:14 +0200
Message-ID: <ur78ujhal.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <4390624C.6090600@swipnet.se> <ubqzzbavv.fsf@gnu.org>
	<E1EiZmQ-00064g-QD@fencepost.gnu.org>
Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1133626069 22759 80.91.229.2 (3 Dec 2005 16:07:49 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2005 16:07:49 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Dec 03 17:07:39 2005
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1EiZvH-0005WC-Bz
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 03 Dec 2005 17:07:39 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1EiZvJ-0002jg-Q7
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 03 Dec 2005 11:07:41 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1EiZv9-0002ja-Rv
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Dec 2005 11:07:31 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1EiZv9-0002jO-Cw
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Dec 2005 11:07:31 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EiZv9-0002jL-9s
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Dec 2005 11:07:31 -0500
Original-Received: from [192.114.186.66] (helo=romy.inter.net.il)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34)
	id 1EiZvC-0006nR-2z; Sat, 03 Dec 2005 11:07:34 -0500
Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-80-230-149-131.inter.net.il
	[80.230.149.131]) by romy.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.2-GA)
	with ESMTP id DCJ87328 (AUTH halo1);
	Sat, 3 Dec 2005 18:07:15 +0200 (IST)
Original-To: rms@gnu.org
In-reply-to: <E1EiZmQ-00064g-QD@fencepost.gnu.org> (rms@gnu.org)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:46938
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/46938>

> From: "Richard M. Stallman" <rms@gnu.org>
> CC: jan.h.d@swipnet.se, emacs-devel@gnu.org
> Date: Sat, 03 Dec 2005 10:58:30 -0500
> 
>     How about if we complain loudly to the GCC maintainers about these
>     silly warnings, and ask them to modify GCC so that it issues them only
>     under -Wall?
> 
> I would support asking them to show a justification for this change.

Could you perhaps actually write to them?  Based on my past (and
bitter) experience of talking to them about similar issues, it will
probably take your authority to get them to give any serious and
technical answers.