From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Abrahams Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs antialiasing in X Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2006 11:13:49 -0500 Message-ID: References: <877j9ya8tu.fsf@boost-consulting.com> <200512220938.jBM9c8Lf021116@coolsville.localdomain> <873bjtoy1i.fsf@boost-consulting.com> <0B2B9218-7271-493B-A60D-F912E09E6E27@swipnet.se> <8764onlsq4.fsf@boost-consulting.com> <87oe2eisl2.fsf@boost-consulting.com> <87irsmkuzh.fsf@emfox.3322.org> <43CA0874.9090706@swipnet.se> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1137341772 31583 80.91.229.2 (15 Jan 2006 16:16:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2006 16:16:12 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jan 15 17:16:07 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EyAXz-0003h3-5W for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 15 Jan 2006 17:16:03 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EyAaD-00061P-MX for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 15 Jan 2006 11:18:21 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EyAZ4-0005qf-Ck for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Jan 2006 11:17:10 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EyAYh-00051Y-1e for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Jan 2006 11:16:47 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EyAYT-0004cP-25 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Jan 2006 11:16:33 -0500 Original-Received: from [80.91.229.2] (helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA:16) (Exim 4.34) id 1EyAbp-0002LB-0i for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Jan 2006 11:20:01 -0500 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1EyAW5-00031j-Vj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Jan 2006 17:14:06 +0100 Original-Received: from 209-150-60-201.c3-0.smr-ubr2.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com ([209.150.60.201]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 15 Jan 2006 17:14:05 +0100 Original-Received: from dave by 209-150-60-201.c3-0.smr-ubr2.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 15 Jan 2006 17:14:05 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Lines: 29 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 209-150-60-201.c3-0.smr-ubr2.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/22.0.50 (windows-nt) Cancel-Lock: sha1:SrWOQlDRU+9fZ8kwBlaqVoq1w0o= X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:49131 Archived-At: Jan Djärv writes: > Emfox Zhou wrote: >> David Abrahams writes: > >>>in emacs-unicode-2, do I want to keep the latter, since the >>>character representation is changing? >>> >>>Also, would it be better to come up with a patch against >>>emacs-unicode-2 that adds XFT support, or vice-versa? I am inclined >>>towards the former. >>> >> I think emacs-unicode-2 is more recent, and a patch against >> emacs-unicode-2 >> to add XFT support is better. as a notice, I have tested both of the branches, >> and find the XFT branch could not deal properly with chinese, while the unicode >> one seems ok for everything. > > I agree, you would start with emacs-unicode-2 and then add XFT to that, i.e. > the former as you state above. W.r.t. characters, this implies that you shall > keep whatever is in the emacs-unicode-2 branch. OK, great. What about Changelog, NEWS, etc.? I seriously doubt my ability to reason about what should be kept from each branch. -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com