From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: definition lines in Info - 1) link, 2) highlight
Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 22:29:38 +0300
Message-ID: <ur6zhlrvh.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <EIENLHALHGIMHGDOLMIMMEIICKAA.drew.adams@oracle.com>
Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1155670212 8530 80.91.229.2 (15 Aug 2006 19:30:12 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 19:30:12 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Aug 15 21:30:08 2006
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GD4bp-0005J0-6r
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 15 Aug 2006 21:29:53 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GD4bo-0002yd-La
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 15 Aug 2006 15:29:52 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GD4bc-0002yV-N1
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Aug 2006 15:29:40 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GD4bb-0002yJ-HI
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Aug 2006 15:29:40 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GD4bb-0002yG-EO
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Aug 2006 15:29:39 -0400
Original-Received: from [192.114.186.73] (helo=heller.inter.net.il)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GD4hh-0001aN-Fv
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Aug 2006 15:35:57 -0400
Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-80-230-205-220.inter.net.il
	[80.230.205.220]) by heller.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3a-GA)
	with ESMTP id AFR55784 (AUTH halo1);
	Tue, 15 Aug 2006 22:29:37 +0300 (IDT)
Original-To: "Drew Adams" <drew.adams@oracle.com>
In-reply-to: <EIENLHALHGIMHGDOLMIMMEIICKAA.drew.adams@oracle.com>
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:58409
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/58409>

> From: "Drew Adams" <drew.adams@oracle.com>
> Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 07:57:46 -0700
> 
> BTW, I'm curious - why is introducing new faces not simple? Is it because of
> trying to get the default value right for different types of display and
> different background values?

That, and the ensuing endless arguments about what should the default
colors be.