From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: utf-16le vs utf-16-le Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 21:54:46 +0300 Message-ID: References: <85lk3hotkw.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1208199579 12812 80.91.229.12 (14 Apr 2008 18:59:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 18:59:39 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, handa@m17n.org To: David Kastrup Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Apr 14 21:00:13 2008 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JlTq6-0004Zp-Qt for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 14 Apr 2008 20:55:38 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JlTpS-0008Je-Ip for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 14 Apr 2008 14:54:58 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JlTpO-0008FW-55 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Apr 2008 14:54:54 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JlTpM-0008Dr-Vd for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Apr 2008 14:54:53 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JlTpM-0008DU-SL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Apr 2008 14:54:52 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout5.012.net.il ([84.95.2.13]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JlTpI-0008V3-48; Mon, 14 Apr 2008 14:54:48 -0400 Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([83.130.246.94]) by i_mtaout5.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2004.12) with ESMTPA id <0JZB000NWX6PWZQ3@i_mtaout5.012.net.il>; Mon, 14 Apr 2008 22:08:49 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: <85lk3hotkw.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 9.1 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:95200 Archived-At: > From: David Kastrup > Cc: Stefan Monnier , eliz@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 08:10:07 +0200 > > How does recode-region work with encodings having a BOM? Probably the > problem is not dissimilar to working with shift encodings. Still I have > a hard time to picture either. I'm not following: what exactly puzzles you in this, and why recode-region is an issue?