From: Steinar Bang <sb@dod.no>
To: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: On the popularity of git
Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2015 22:08:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <upzcpozueog2.fsf@dod.no> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20151031165007.GA20747@acm.fritz.box
>>>>> Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de>:
> Not at all. There are 20, 30, or 50 options which all consciously
> have to be omitted. Otherwise you are stumbling in the dark, or
> merely learning sequences of commands by rote (as I have done), rather
> than truly mastering them.
Could you concretely name some of these 20 to 50 options?
If you have to omit them all the time, it shouldn't be too much work.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-31 21:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 90+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-28 19:20 Git question: when using branches, how does git treat working files when changing branches? Alan Mackenzie
2015-10-28 19:44 ` David Kastrup
2015-10-28 20:00 ` Steinar Bang
2015-10-28 20:04 ` Ricardo Wurmus
2015-10-28 20:10 ` Alex Bennée
2015-10-28 22:32 ` Alan Mackenzie
2015-10-28 22:56 ` Xue Fuqiao
2015-10-28 22:59 ` Óscar Fuentes
2015-10-28 23:53 ` Alan Mackenzie
2015-10-29 0:17 ` Dmitry Gutov
2015-10-29 0:28 ` Michael Heerdegen
2015-10-29 0:49 ` Michael Heerdegen
2015-10-29 2:25 ` Yuri Khan
2015-10-29 8:21 ` David Kastrup
2015-10-29 12:35 ` Alan Mackenzie
2015-10-29 13:21 ` David Kastrup
2015-10-29 17:02 ` On the popularity of git [Was: Git question: when using branches, how does git treat working files when changing branches?] Alan Mackenzie
2015-10-29 17:22 ` David Kastrup
2015-10-29 18:08 ` John Wiegley
2015-10-30 7:48 ` Paul Eggert
2015-10-30 9:27 ` Alan Mackenzie
2015-10-30 9:48 ` David Kastrup
2015-10-30 10:34 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-10-30 21:44 ` Paul Eggert
2015-10-30 9:09 ` joakim
2015-10-30 10:49 ` Yuri Khan
2015-10-31 3:16 ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2015-10-31 8:24 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-10-31 8:32 ` Andreas Schwab
2015-10-31 11:35 ` Oleh Krehel
2015-10-31 12:19 ` David Kastrup
2015-11-02 22:01 ` Nikolaus Rath
2015-11-03 8:42 ` David Kastrup
2015-11-03 17:38 ` Nikolaus Rath
2015-10-31 16:02 ` On the popularity of git Stephen J. Turnbull
2015-11-01 8:08 ` Uwe Brauer
2015-10-31 16:50 ` Alan Mackenzie
2015-10-31 16:58 ` Dmitry Gutov
2015-11-02 22:05 ` Nikolaus Rath
2015-11-03 8:39 ` David Kastrup
2015-10-31 19:24 ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2015-10-31 20:13 ` David Kastrup
2015-10-31 21:08 ` Steinar Bang [this message]
2015-10-31 21:15 ` David Kastrup
2015-10-31 21:48 ` Alan Mackenzie
2015-11-01 8:17 ` Steinar Bang
2015-11-01 8:54 ` David Kastrup
2015-11-01 10:17 ` Steinar Bang
2015-11-01 11:15 ` Juanma Barranquero
2015-11-02 20:11 ` John Wiegley
2015-11-03 7:00 ` Oleh Krehel
2015-11-03 10:07 ` Dmitry Gutov
2015-11-03 11:58 ` Juanma Barranquero
2015-11-03 13:08 ` John Wiegley
2015-11-03 13:30 ` Juanma Barranquero
2015-11-03 13:38 ` Dmitry Gutov
2015-11-03 13:43 ` Juanma Barranquero
2015-11-03 13:49 ` Dmitry Gutov
2015-11-03 13:58 ` Juanma Barranquero
2015-11-03 14:14 ` Alan Mackenzie
2015-11-03 14:25 ` Juanma Barranquero
2015-11-03 13:43 ` Oleh Krehel
2015-11-03 14:35 ` Óscar Fuentes
2015-11-03 14:52 ` Juanma Barranquero
2015-11-03 15:58 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-11-03 16:04 ` Dmitry Gutov
2015-11-03 18:14 ` Óscar Fuentes
2015-11-03 19:40 ` Jay Belanger
2015-11-03 20:15 ` John Wiegley
2015-11-03 20:24 ` Drew Adams
2015-11-03 20:35 ` Changing the tone of emacs-devel (Was: On the popularity of git) John Wiegley
2015-11-03 22:05 ` Artur Malabarba
2015-11-04 7:54 ` Nicolas Petton
2015-11-03 21:47 ` Changing the subject (was: " David Kastrup
2015-11-03 23:37 ` Marcin Borkowski
2015-11-04 0:27 ` John Yates
2015-11-04 1:40 ` Changing the subject Yann Hodique
2015-11-04 15:37 ` John Wiegley
2015-11-03 22:11 ` emacs-devel etiquette (was: Re: On the popularity of git) Stephen Leake
2015-11-04 11:12 ` Future emacs mailing lists. [Was: On the popularity of git] Alan Mackenzie
2015-11-04 7:52 ` On the popularity of git Stephen J. Turnbull
2015-11-03 20:53 ` Richard Stallman
2015-11-03 13:49 ` Andreas Schwab
2015-10-30 12:50 ` On the popularity of git [Was: Git question: when using branches, how does git treat working files when changing branches?] Juanma Barranquero
2015-10-30 14:15 ` David Kastrup
2015-10-30 16:54 ` Juanma Barranquero
2015-10-30 17:31 ` David Kastrup
2015-10-29 16:31 ` Git question: when using branches, how does git treat working files when changing branches? Eli Zaretskii
2015-10-29 16:16 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-10-29 17:45 ` Davis Herring
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=upzcpozueog2.fsf@dod.no \
--to=sb@dod.no \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).