From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Steinar Bang Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Dynamic loading progress Date: Sun, 08 Nov 2015 13:51:56 +0100 Organization: Probably a good idea Message-ID: References: <87zizeme8k.fsf@tromey.com> <5625B166.3080104@dancol.org> <86zizdczhp.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <871tc315y3.fsf@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1446987076 14119 80.91.229.3 (8 Nov 2015 12:51:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2015 12:51:16 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Nov 08 13:51:03 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZvPR0-0005md-2k for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 08 Nov 2015 13:51:02 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47160 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZvPQz-0004hJ-Az for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 08 Nov 2015 07:51:01 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33812) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZvPQv-0004gu-Ax for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Nov 2015 07:50:58 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZvPQr-0004Y6-BA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Nov 2015 07:50:57 -0500 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:60533) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZvPQr-0004Y2-4h for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Nov 2015 07:50:53 -0500 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZvPQp-0005eC-F6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Nov 2015 13:50:51 +0100 Original-Received: from cm-84.208.248.210.getinternet.no ([84.208.248.210]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 08 Nov 2015 13:50:51 +0100 Original-Received: from sb by cm-84.208.248.210.getinternet.no with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 08 Nov 2015 13:50:51 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Lines: 15 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: cm-84.208.248.210.getinternet.no Mail-Copies-To: never User-Agent: Gnus/5.130012 (Ma Gnus v0.12) Emacs/24.4 (windows-nt) Cancel-Lock: sha1:aUzou9fUIwabBcuiNXrRyalfk5Q= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 80.91.229.3 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:193604 Archived-At: >>>>> Philipp Stephani : > Would you prefer this as one big patch, or as several smaller ones? A big > patch would make it easier to see the code in context, but splitting it up > might increase review speed. Unless you have done strange rebasing on your git branch, but instead used plain merges, then I would suggest doing a git merge instead of using patches. That will preserve the full history of the files, for "git blame" (aka. annotate) and git log. The merge commit can also be used to provide the patch diff it that is desired for review, etc.