From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jason Rumney Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Bootstrap fails on w32 Date: Sun, 22 May 2005 23:13:46 +0100 Message-ID: References: <428FB183.3000209@student.lu.se> <4290EDA8.7020401@student.lu.se> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1116800358 19695 80.91.229.2 (22 May 2005 22:19:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 22 May 2005 22:19:18 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon May 23 00:19:15 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DZyjt-0004s7-OW for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 23 May 2005 00:16:06 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DZynE-0006op-82 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 22 May 2005 18:19:32 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DZyms-0006mi-Td for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 22 May 2005 18:19:11 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DZymr-0006lX-Dc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 22 May 2005 18:19:09 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DZymq-0006kb-TY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 22 May 2005 18:19:08 -0400 Original-Received: from [194.106.33.237] (helo=outmail.freedom2surf.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA:24) (Exim 4.34) id 1DZyr2-00085U-3I for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 22 May 2005 18:23:28 -0400 Original-Received: from wanchan.jasonrumney.net (i-195-137-77-250.freedom2surf.net [195.137.77.250]) by outmail.freedom2surf.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j4MME7ch009063; Sun, 22 May 2005 23:14:07 +0100 Original-Received: from TONKOTSU-RAMEN (tonkotsu-ramen.jasonrumney.net [10.0.0.28]) by wanchan.jasonrumney.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87BFDDDE60; Sun, 22 May 2005 23:14:07 +0100 (BST) Original-To: Juanma Barranquero In-Reply-To: (Juanma Barranquero's message of "Sun, 22 May 2005 23:52:21 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (windows-nt) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:37482 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:37482 Juanma Barranquero writes: > On 5/22/05, Jason Rumney wrote: > >> I generally keep two copies >> of the nt directory checked out. One checked out with -kb for >> compiling with, and one checked out normally for checking in any >> changes I make, or doing diffs etc. > > Why would that be necessary? Having a non -kb copy for commiting > changes and doing diffs, I mean. I seem to have no trouble with the > -kb files of nt/ (using CVSNT). I don't know, I have never studied the code for CVS, it just seems safer to me to avoid checking in changes from a directory that has been checked out with -kb.