From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [Emacs-diffs] Changes to emacs/nt/INSTALL Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2005 23:20:42 +0300 Message-ID: References: Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1118522255 13346 80.91.229.2 (11 Jun 2005 20:37:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2005 20:37:35 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jun 11 22:37:34 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DhCj9-0005kW-8N for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 11 Jun 2005 22:37:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DhCnb-0005xe-7M for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 11 Jun 2005 16:41:47 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DhCkz-0004oG-LM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Jun 2005 16:39:06 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DhCkw-0004mn-UL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Jun 2005 16:39:03 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DhCkw-0004a5-6J for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Jun 2005 16:39:02 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.114.186.66] (helo=romy.inter.net.il) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DhCTu-0007OA-SA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Jun 2005 16:21:27 -0400 Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-80-230-88-38.inter.net.il [80.230.88.38]) by romy.inter.net.il (MOS 3.5.8-GR) with ESMTP id BMS47672 (AUTH halo1); Sat, 11 Jun 2005 23:20:39 +0300 (IDT) Original-To: Juanma Barranquero In-reply-to: (message from Juanma Barranquero on Sat, 11 Jun 2005 18:33:39 +0200) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:38594 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:38594 > Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2005 18:33:39 +0200 > From: Juanma Barranquero > > > + (WARNING: Do NOT use this suggestion if you have write access to the > > + Emacs CVS tree and intend to commit changes to CVS. This is because -kb > > + is sticky: it will be used in all future CVS operations on the files you > > + check out like this.) > > Didn't we discuss this already and concluded that it wasn't a problem? I asked a question about that, but didn't see any replies. All my references, including the CVS manual, indicate that -kb will be used henceforth with any CVS operation. If you (or someone else) know otherwise, please tell the details. > I know I've committed files from nt/ that I had checked out with -kb. I never said that committing files will be impossible; binary files can be committed as well. The question is, what does CVS think about these files, and whether all versions have diffs associated etc.