From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Buffer listing in multiple frames/ttys Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2005 06:33:57 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87wtinrypp.fsf@jurta.org> <87u0dqm5ta.fsf@jurta.org> <87d5kc34rx.fsf@jurta.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1133757340 30734 80.91.229.2 (5 Dec 2005 04:35:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2005 04:35:40 +0000 (UTC) Cc: lorentey@elte.hu, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Dec 05 05:35:31 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ej83K-0006Ve-L8 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 05 Dec 2005 05:34:14 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ej83R-00079E-GW for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 04 Dec 2005 23:34:21 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Ej83B-00077K-Fz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Dec 2005 23:34:05 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Ej839-00072y-H6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Dec 2005 23:34:05 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ej839-00072d-AB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Dec 2005 23:34:03 -0500 Original-Received: from [192.114.186.66] (helo=romy.inter.net.il) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Ej83a-00068u-8u for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Dec 2005 23:34:30 -0500 Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-80-230-7-140.inter.net.il [80.230.7.140]) by romy.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.2-GA) with ESMTP id DCQ02824 (AUTH halo1); Mon, 5 Dec 2005 06:33:52 +0200 (IST) Original-To: Juri Linkov In-reply-to: <87d5kc34rx.fsf@jurta.org> (message from Juri Linkov on Sun, 04 Dec 2005 23:56:34 +0200) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:46987 Archived-At: > From: Juri Linkov > Date: Sun, 04 Dec 2005 23:56:34 +0200 > Cc: lorentey@elte.hu, emacs-devel@gnu.org > > > So a buried buffer is > > no longer available from (frame-parameter nil 'buffer-list) for > > `prev-buffer' called in the same frame after changing the order of > > buried buffers in another frame. > > > > Why is that a problem? > > I often use `next-buffer' to switch to the next buffer in the buffer list, > and I expect that `prev-buffer' restores exactly the same buffers as left > with `next-buffer'. However, after switching to another frame, and using > `next-buffer' in another frame and switching back to the original frame, > `prev-buffer' no more restores the same buffer as left with `next-buffer' > in the same frame. But originally, you said that this happens after burying the buffer. If you want the history to work right for a buffer, why do you bury it? Burying a buffer tells Emacs you are no longer interested in that buffer, I'm sure you know this.