From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: [drew.adams@oracle.com: RE: file-cache doc should state that
	thecache is non-persistent]
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 20:40:24 +0200
Message-ID: <upsk6beg7.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <DNEMKBNJBGPAOPIJOOICMEDCDEAA.drew.adams@oracle.com>
Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1143571274 19462 80.91.229.2 (28 Mar 2006 18:41:14 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 18:41:14 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 28 20:41:11 2006
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FOJ7j-0004k4-MY
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 28 Mar 2006 20:41:00 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FOJ7j-0007dj-2p
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 28 Mar 2006 13:40:59 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FOJ7B-0007GN-Bf
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Mar 2006 13:40:25 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FOJ79-0007Ev-Gm
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Mar 2006 13:40:24 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FOJ79-0007Ep-Aa
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Mar 2006 13:40:23 -0500
Original-Received: from [192.114.186.66] (helo=romy.inter.net.il)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FOJ8v-0007wS-KM
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Mar 2006 13:42:13 -0500
Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-84-228-161-43.inter.net.il
	[84.228.161.43]) by romy.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3-GA)
	with ESMTP id DVT46647 (AUTH halo1);
	Tue, 28 Mar 2006 20:40:20 +0200 (IST)
Original-To: "Drew Adams" <drew.adams@oracle.com>
In-reply-to: <DNEMKBNJBGPAOPIJOOICMEDCDEAA.drew.adams@oracle.com>
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:52158
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/52158>

> From: "Drew Adams" <drew.adams@oracle.com>
> Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 07:32:11 -0800
> 
>     Btw, should we merge the "File Name Cache" section with the following
>     one, "File Convenience"?  They are both short, and the file cache is
>     certainly a convenience feature of the kind described in the latter
>     section.
> 
> No, I don't think that's a very good idea. File Name Cache is a reasonable,
> self-contained topic. File Convenience is, currently, a grab-bag or
> catch-all.

There's nothing wrong with a grab-bag section describing a feature
that has several commands.