From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ulrich Mueller Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: emacs-29 3c1693d08b0: Fix Elisp code injection vulnerability in emacsclient-mail.desktop Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2023 13:14:28 +0100 Message-ID: References: <167821009581.14664.5608674978571454819@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <20230307172816.2D56BC13915@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <877cvsozn5.fsf@yahoo.com> <87zg8onfob.fsf@yahoo.com> <87ilfbpm0d.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="40401"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.3 (gnu/linux) Cc: Po Lu , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Robert Pluim Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 08 13:15:19 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pZshS-000AL2-Vt for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 08 Mar 2023 13:15:18 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pZsgo-0005mb-OD; Wed, 08 Mar 2023 07:14:38 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pZsgn-0005mN-3p for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Mar 2023 07:14:37 -0500 Original-Received: from dev.gentoo.org ([2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4] helo=smtp.gentoo.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_CHACHA20_POLY1305:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pZsgl-0008EE-HH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Mar 2023 07:14:36 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87ilfbpm0d.fsf@gmail.com> (Robert Pluim's message of "Wed, 08 Mar 2023 11:37:06 +0100") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4; envelope-from=ulm@gentoo.org; helo=smtp.gentoo.org X-Spam_score_int: -41 X-Spam_score: -4.2 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.2 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:304124 Archived-At: >>>>> On Wed, 08 Mar 2023, Robert Pluim wrote: > + { "funcall", no_argument, NULL, 'l' }, I understand that options -f, -F, -u, -n, -c, and -a are already taken. Still, I find -l for the short option confusing, because emacs itself uses -f for --funcall and -l for --load. Do we need a short option?