From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Back to emacsclient/server Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 06:35:22 +0200 Message-ID: References: Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1161664546 13401 80.91.229.2 (24 Oct 2006 04:35:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 04:35:46 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 24 06:35:44 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GcE0s-0001Po-Dj for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 24 Oct 2006 06:35:42 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GcE0r-0007bH-Tq for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 24 Oct 2006 00:35:41 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GcE0g-0007b1-2p for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Oct 2006 00:35:30 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GcE0d-0007YZ-Uc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Oct 2006 00:35:29 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GcE0d-0007YS-Np for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Oct 2006 00:35:27 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.114.186.20] (helo=nitzan.inter.net.il) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GcE0d-0002XF-IL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Oct 2006 00:35:27 -0400 Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-80-230-142-7.inter.net.il [80.230.142.7]) by nitzan.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3a-GA) with ESMTP id EZN71413 (AUTH halo1); Tue, 24 Oct 2006 06:35:21 +0200 (IST) Original-To: Ted Zlatanov In-reply-to: (message from Ted Zlatanov on Tue, 24 Oct 2006 01:02:18 +0100) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:61090 Archived-At: > From: Ted Zlatanov > Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 01:02:18 +0100 > > > That sounds like a huge overkill to me. Let's not forget that > > emacsclient is first and foremost for _local_ connections, and these > > hardly justify SSH. > > Oh, I understand that. Local IP connections are generally much faster > than external IP connections. I meant ``local'' as in ``on the same machine''. No IP connection is needed. > There are performance and memory hits, yes, but they are minor > compared to the gains I listed earlier. What about the overkill of writing a much more complicated code in Emacs? That was what I was talking about.