From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ulrich Mueller Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: etags name collision. Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2022 09:34:25 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20220411134749.ps6g5ulpbamzm6ot@Ergus> <83k0bv679q.fsf@gnu.org> <20220411154635.qfw2ijpdahiv5ctl@Ergus> <83fsmj62jl.fsf@gnu.org> <20220411161942.xsqr3ekorpm6jf6y@Ergus> <83ee2360aq.fsf@gnu.org> <20220411191933.wyxvmgpyd4hnpfc2@Ergus> <20220411195350.7jhugti3e3vng6yx@Ergus> <20220411222042.ew7js5rneved7k5m@Ergus> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="15082"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.1 (gnu/linux) Cc: Ergus , eliz@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Alfred M. Szmidt" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Apr 12 09:37:09 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1neB5J-0003pY-KI for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 12 Apr 2022 09:37:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45664 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1neB5I-0005Xa-8J for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 12 Apr 2022 03:37:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55018) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1neB2o-0004Ra-L8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Apr 2022 03:34:34 -0400 Original-Received: from woodpecker.gentoo.org ([140.211.166.183]:53476 helo=smtp.gentoo.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_CHACHA20_POLY1305:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1neB2m-00007e-B5; Tue, 12 Apr 2022 03:34:33 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Alfred M. Szmidt's message of "Tue, 12 Apr 2022 03:21:48 -0400") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=140.211.166.183; envelope-from=ulm@gentoo.org; helo=smtp.gentoo.org X-Spam_score_int: -68 X-Spam_score: -6.9 X-Spam_bar: ------ X-Spam_report: (-6.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:288275 Archived-At: >>>>> On Tue, 12 Apr 2022, Alfred M Szmidt wrote: > On some systems /usr/bin/ctags is always GNU Emacs ctags (e.g., Gentoo > GNU/Linux); not Exuberant Ctags which is installed as exuberant-ctags. The last part is correct. However, the ctags flavour can be configured: # ls -l /usr/bin/ctags lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 14 Apr 5 09:31 /usr/bin/ctags -> ctags-emacs-28 # eselect ctags list Available ctags symlink targets: [1] ctags-emacs-28 * [2] exuberant-ctags # eselect ctags set 2 Switching ctags to exuberant-ctags ... # ls -l /usr/bin/ctags lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 15 Apr 12 09:32 /usr/bin/ctags -> exuberant-ctags