From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: RMAIL against Texinfo Date: 02 Feb 2004 07:59:08 +0200 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <2914-Sun01Feb2004191602+0200-eliz@elta.co.il> <87isiq5uzg.fsf@emptyhost.emptydomain.de> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1075701717 3394 80.91.224.253 (2 Feb 2004 06:01:57 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2004 06:01:57 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 02 07:01:49 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AnX9Y-00078B-00 for ; Mon, 02 Feb 2004 07:01:48 +0100 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AnX9Y-00065N-00 for ; Mon, 02 Feb 2004 07:01:48 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AnX6I-00045S-Mu for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Mon, 02 Feb 2004 00:58:26 -0500 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.24) id 1AnX61-00042y-F6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Feb 2004 00:58:09 -0500 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.24) id 1AnX5T-0003C6-C0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Feb 2004 00:58:07 -0500 Original-Received: from [207.232.27.5] (helo=WST0054) by monty-python.gnu.org with asmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AnX5R-00034A-N8; Mon, 02 Feb 2004 00:57:33 -0500 Original-To: Kai Grossjohann In-reply-to: <87isiq5uzg.fsf@emptyhost.emptydomain.de> (message from Kai Grossjohann on Sun, 01 Feb 2004 22:51:31 +0100) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.2 Precedence: list List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:19635 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:19635 > From: Kai Grossjohann > Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2004 22:51:31 +0100 > > This will still remove frumple-info and tex-info from the list of > addresses. So you are saying that using \` instead of \< would be better? (I used \< because I thought about addresses like , with the brackets intact.) > Also, there is experience with nnmail-fancy-split in Gnus, which > automatically surrounds regexes with \\< and \\>. Users are supposed > to say ".*foo.*" if they want to undo the effect of \\<...\\>. But > after some years it turned out that this didn't always work, and now > there is additional code in the function supporting nnmail-split-fancy > which checks for the regex starting with ".*"... I forgot what > exactly was the problem, though. Well, do you see any reason that this would be relevant to the case in point? mail-utils.el doesn't surround regular expressions with \< and \>, it only does that with usernames, which aren't regexps. > I'm afraid that with a similar change for rmail-dont-reply-to-names, > you might fall into similar traps. Like what? > And it doesn't even cover all cases. Sure, but it does make the current situation better, doesn't it?