From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: New function for gdb-ui.el? Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 08:43:01 +0200 Message-ID: References: <17243.21638.138477.436126@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <17244.34246.93773.562211@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <17245.17271.523511.307415@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1130310644 22672 80.91.229.2 (26 Oct 2005 07:10:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 07:10:44 +0000 (UTC) Cc: nickrob@snap.net.nz, ich@frank-schmitt.net, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Oct 26 09:10:33 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EUfPG-0000uc-Du for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 26 Oct 2005 09:09:06 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EUfPE-0005Cp-Vb for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 26 Oct 2005 03:09:05 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EUf0I-0002FL-0X for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Oct 2005 02:43:18 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EUf0F-0002El-Ka for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Oct 2005 02:43:16 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EUf0F-0002EH-6O for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Oct 2005 02:43:15 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.114.186.20] (helo=nitzan.inter.net.il) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1EUf0B-0002bc-LI; Wed, 26 Oct 2005 02:43:11 -0400 Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-80-230-83-33.inter.net.il [80.230.83.33]) by nitzan.inter.net.il (MOS 3.6.5-GR) with ESMTP id BTX37773 (AUTH halo1); Wed, 26 Oct 2005 08:43:01 +0200 (IST) Original-To: rms@gnu.org In-reply-to: (rms@gnu.org) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:44887 Archived-At: > From: "Richard M. Stallman" > Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 16:27:06 -0400 > Cc: ich@frank-schmitt.net, emacs-devel@gnu.org > > > To move to another file usually means moving to another frame, and > > that's not the job of `until'. This command should refuse > > to move to another frame. > > Yes, you're right. > > Actually, now I am not sure what I said is true. Maybe `until' just > sets a temporary breakpoint and continues. If so, it would actually > "work" even if you specify a line in a different function. If you give `until' an argument, it does set a temporary breakpoint, but when it breaks, GDB checks that it is in the same frame as where the `until' command was given, and if it isn't, it doesn't stop the program.