From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: ECB Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2006 00:18:50 +0200 Message-ID: References: Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1142016981 13282 80.91.229.2 (10 Mar 2006 18:56:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 18:56:21 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, rms@gnu.org, klaus.berndl@sdm.de Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 10 19:56:19 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FHmmf-0006Gw-5L for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 10 Mar 2006 19:56:17 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FHmmb-000681-CY for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 10 Mar 2006 13:56:13 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FH6zp-0006AC-1t for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Mar 2006 17:19:05 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FH6zo-00069y-Bx for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Mar 2006 17:19:04 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FH6zo-00069v-AQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Mar 2006 17:19:04 -0500 Original-Received: from [192.114.186.17] (helo=gandalf.inter.net.il) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FH72g-0005hi-Ix; Wed, 08 Mar 2006 17:22:02 -0500 Original-Received: from nitzan.inter.net.il (nitzan.inter.net.il [192.114.186.20]) by gandalf.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.1-GA) with ESMTP id ICF01228; Thu, 9 Mar 2006 00:18:47 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-84-228-165-116.inter.net.il [84.228.165.116]) by nitzan.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3-GA) with ESMTP id CVX24917 (AUTH halo1); Thu, 9 Mar 2006 00:18:44 +0200 (IST) Original-To: Stefan Monnier In-reply-to: (message from Stefan Monnier on Wed, 08 Mar 2006 09:54:33 -0500) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:51433 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Monnier > Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2006 09:54:33 -0500 > Cc: rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org > > > And IMVHO display-buffer should be moved from c-kernel to elisp-code > > 100% agreement. Based on what, exactly? Do we know for a fact that its performance is so unimportant that the slower running times of Lisp will go unnoticed?