From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: PURESIZE increased (again)
Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2006 19:59:15 +0300
Message-ID: <umzelzcbg.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <ur73yyp4g.fsf@gnu.org> <87lku5u6tx.fsf@pacem.orebokech.com>
	<jek69pogzf.fsf@sykes.suse.de>
Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1145206782 30428 80.91.229.2 (16 Apr 2006 16:59:42 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2006 16:59:42 +0000 (UTC)
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Apr 16 18:59:37 2006
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FVAay-0003om-9R
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 16 Apr 2006 18:59:32 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FVAax-0004UE-7S
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 16 Apr 2006 12:59:31 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FVAai-0004Ti-Mw
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Apr 2006 12:59:16 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FVAah-0004TK-Ro
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Apr 2006 12:59:16 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FVAah-0004TH-M8
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Apr 2006 12:59:15 -0400
Original-Received: from [192.114.186.20] (helo=nitzan.inter.net.il)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FVAbA-0004mw-CH
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Apr 2006 12:59:44 -0400
Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-80-230-83-86.inter.net.il [80.230.83.86])
	by nitzan.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3-GA)
	with ESMTP id DDO53389 (AUTH halo1);
	Sun, 16 Apr 2006 19:59:13 +0300 (IDT)
Original-To: romain@orebokech.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org
In-reply-to: <jek69pogzf.fsf@sykes.suse.de> (message from Andreas Schwab on
	Sun, 16 Apr 2006 14:13:56 +0200)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:52922
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/52922>

> From: Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>
> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>, emacs-devel@gnu.org
> Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2006 14:13:56 +0200
> 
> Romain Francoise <romain@orebokech.com> writes:
> 
> > Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
> >
> >> Romain, could you please tell why you increased BASE_PURESIZE by
> >> another 10,000?
> >
> > Because I built Emacs and there wasn't enough pure space available...
> > The log indicated 1200696 bytes used,
> 
> Where do you see that?

I second the question.  How was that build configured, for what
variant of GNU/Linux, and which CPU?

> I see only 1198536 bytes (1877040 on 64bit).

And I see 1102088 in a GNU/Linux build without X.  I doubt that adding
X could bump it by 100K bytes.

I also doubt very much that the Windows build is so different from a
32-build on GNU/Linux.

So your results, Romain, look quite strange.  I think we need to
understand them before we decide to increase PURESIZE.