From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: emacs snapshot tarball test build Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2007 16:04:43 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20070314103104.1228@henman-np.b-eng.it.to-be.co.jp> <20070323103419.2652@henman-np.b-eng.it.to-be.co.jp> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1174658708 21671 80.91.229.12 (23 Mar 2007 14:05:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2007 14:05:08 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Angelo.Graziosi@roma1.infn.it, henman@it.to-be.co.jp, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "djh" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 23 15:04:55 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HUkNv-0002Ks-9q for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 23 Mar 2007 15:04:51 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HUkPp-0003NG-D0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 23 Mar 2007 09:06:49 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HUkPm-0003MI-Hk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Mar 2007 10:06:46 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HUkPl-0003LL-90 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Mar 2007 10:06:46 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HUkPl-0003LI-2F for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Mar 2007 09:06:45 -0500 Original-Received: from heller.inter.net.il ([213.8.233.23]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HUkNp-0003uH-Ty for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Mar 2007 10:04:46 -0400 Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([81.5.34.178]) by heller.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3a-GA) with ESMTP id CEN22067 (AUTH halo1); Fri, 23 Mar 2007 16:04:38 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <20070323103419.2652@henman-np.b-eng.it.to-be.co.jp> X-detected-kernel: FreeBSD 4.7-5.2 (or MacOS X 10.2-10.4) (2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:68394 Archived-At: > From: "djh" > Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2007 10:34:19 +0900 > Cc: djh , emacs-devel@gnu.org > > It would be good to know why "make" aborted on blessmail.el. It was reported as > "Fatal error (6)make[1]: *** [blessmail] Aborted (core dumped)" below. It's not "make" who aborted, it's Emacs. "make" just printed a human-readable description of why Emacs died.