From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: PURESIZE increased (again) Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 10:49:29 +0300 Message-ID: References: <87lku5u6tx.fsf@pacem.orebokech.com> <8764l4oro5.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1145605798 8730 80.91.229.2 (21 Apr 2006 07:49:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 07:49:58 +0000 (UTC) Cc: romain@orebokech.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Apr 21 09:49:56 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FWqOi-0004b4-3U for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 21 Apr 2006 09:49:49 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FWqOh-0002Qk-Ku for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 21 Apr 2006 03:49:47 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FWqOT-0002QL-HY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Apr 2006 03:49:33 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FWqOS-0002Q7-5l for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Apr 2006 03:49:33 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FWqOR-0002Q4-Vq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Apr 2006 03:49:32 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.114.186.66] (helo=romy.inter.net.il) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FWqPw-0001VC-QQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Apr 2006 03:51:05 -0400 Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-83-130-209-21.inter.net.il [83.130.209.21]) by romy.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3-GA) with ESMTP id EAC56875 (AUTH halo1); Fri, 21 Apr 2006 10:49:21 +0300 (IDT) Original-To: Stefan Monnier In-reply-to: <8764l4oro5.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> (message from Stefan Monnier on Thu, 20 Apr 2006 17:37:59 -0400) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:53173 Archived-At: > Cc: romain@orebokech.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org > From: Stefan Monnier > Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 17:37:59 -0400 > > AFAIK these low numbers have no meaning: if the pure size overflows, the > number printed is always some ridiculously low number, unrelated to the > actual size of the pure space Yes, you are right: the backup strategy zeroes out pure_bytes_used, so what gets printed is just the portion that didn't fit into pure[].