From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: PURESIZE increased (again) Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 19:19:59 +0300 Message-ID: References: <87lku5u6tx.fsf@pacem.orebokech.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1146241234 25802 80.91.229.2 (28 Apr 2006 16:20:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 16:20:34 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Apr 28 18:20:33 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FZVhX-0005Re-W2 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 28 Apr 2006 18:20:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FZVhX-000709-Bq for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 28 Apr 2006 12:20:15 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FZVhL-0006zw-Vh for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Apr 2006 12:20:04 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FZVhK-0006zc-FT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Apr 2006 12:20:03 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FZVhK-0006zZ-CV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Apr 2006 12:20:02 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.114.186.66] (helo=romy.inter.net.il) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FZVkU-0002X7-Bl for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Apr 2006 12:23:18 -0400 Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-80-230-12-254.inter.net.il [80.230.12.254]) by romy.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3-GA) with ESMTP id EBN97698 (AUTH halo1); Fri, 28 Apr 2006 19:20:00 +0300 (IDT) Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org In-reply-to: (message from Reiner Steib on Fri, 28 Apr 2006 15:11:52 +0200) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:53563 Archived-At: > From: Reiner Steib > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 15:11:52 +0200 > > Okay, the following results are with an unmodified, clean source > tree[1] with configure ... && make bootstrap. I've put the complete > logs for each arch (i686 and x86_64) on the web [2] in the files > emacs-build-`date -I`-`uname -m`.log.gz (*.gz; 39K / 54K). > > During "make bootstrap", I get: > > ,----[ x86_64 ] > | Finding pointers to doc strings...done > | Dumping under names emacs and emacs-22.0.50 > | 108788 pure bytes used > | mv -f emacs bootstrap-emacs > | [...] > | Finding pointers to doc strings...done > | Dumping under names emacs and emacs-22.0.50.1 > | emacs:0:Pure Lisp storage overflow (approx. 2159640 bytes needed) > | 1536 pure bytes used > | ./emacs -q -batch -f list-load-path-shadows > `---- Thanks. So the mystery is still here, since this is the same value you reported before. I think it's time to see whether the *.elc files we use are identical. Can you upload a couple of worst offenders, say, files.elc and simple.elc? I'd like to compare them to mine. TIA