From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Preload encoded-kb on MS-Windows Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 13:17:36 +0300 Message-ID: References: <873bfds4xs.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1148033914 14951 80.91.229.2 (19 May 2006 10:18:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 10:18:34 +0000 (UTC) Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri May 19 12:18:33 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fh23S-0002SK-W5 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 19 May 2006 12:17:59 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fh23S-000847-DX for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 19 May 2006 06:17:58 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Fh23G-00082C-Tq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 19 May 2006 06:17:46 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Fh23F-00080y-4E for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 19 May 2006 06:17:45 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fh23E-00080k-RP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 19 May 2006 06:17:44 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.114.186.66] (helo=romy.inter.net.il) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1Fh26W-0007f8-V8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 19 May 2006 06:21:09 -0400 Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-80-230-11-237.inter.net.il [80.230.11.237]) by romy.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3-GA) with ESMTP id EFO76089 (AUTH halo1); Fri, 19 May 2006 13:17:28 +0300 (IDT) Original-To: Kenichi Handa In-reply-to: (message from Kenichi Handa on Fri, 19 May 2006 09:33:21 +0900) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:54782 Archived-At: > From: Kenichi Handa > CC: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 09:33:21 +0900 > > In article , Eli Zaretskii writes: > > >> But, as a developper, I see a merit in not preloading such > >> files because then the debugging/testing of them gets a > >> little bit easier (we don't have to dump Emacs). > > > Well, we have gobs of files preloaded already, so one more won't hurt > > too much, I think. But I'll defer to Richard's decision. > > It seems that you misunderstand my point above. When *.el > is not preloaded, we can test it by modifying and > byte-compiling that file and just restart Emacs. If *.el is > preloaded, we need an additional step; building Emacs. I did understand what you were saying. My response to that is that we already have that situation with many other files: e.g., when we need to debug files.el, we need to rebuild Emacs.