From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Pretest Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2006 21:54:25 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87lkn1tzav.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87wt6ka3ij.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87ejssjhh0.fsf@furball.mit.edu> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1162497904 17401 80.91.229.2 (2 Nov 2006 20:05:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 20:05:04 +0000 (UTC) Cc: cyd@stupidchicken.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Nov 02 21:04:58 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gfiew-0001ae-6Y for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 02 Nov 2006 20:55:30 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gfiev-00005r-Gx for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 02 Nov 2006 14:55:29 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Gfie5-0007ae-P8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Nov 2006 14:54:37 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Gfie3-0007WC-OT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Nov 2006 14:54:37 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gfie3-0007Vk-J5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Nov 2006 14:54:35 -0500 Original-Received: from [192.114.186.73] (helo=heller.inter.net.il) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1Gfidz-0004vS-Jx; Thu, 02 Nov 2006 14:54:31 -0500 Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-84-229-206-191.inter.net.il [84.229.206.191]) by heller.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3a-GA) with ESMTP id AWN60338 (AUTH halo1); Thu, 2 Nov 2006 21:54:21 +0200 (IST) Original-To: rms@gnu.org In-reply-to: (message from Richard Stallman on Wed, 01 Nov 2006 23:42:24 -0500) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:61622 Archived-At: > From: Richard Stallman > CC: cyd@stupidchicken.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2006 23:42:24 -0500 > > > It is quite mysterious, so I would suggest adding some echo statements > > just before the ld command (in both cases), to verify the arguments > > and environment. > > The arguments are displayed by Make, and they are identical in both > cases. > > What about the environment? It's identical: I did both builds from the same account, just mkdir'ed a subdirectory, chdir'ed there, unpacked the archive and built it.