From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Don't report new bugs for Rmail?? Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 14:47:53 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20090131104403.GQ4175@volo.donarmstrong.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1233406115 7366 80.91.229.12 (31 Jan 2009 12:48:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 12:48:35 +0000 (UTC) Cc: don@donarmstrong.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Juanma Barranquero Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 31 13:49:48 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LTFIB-0007ak-1m for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 31 Jan 2009 13:49:47 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38205 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LTFGs-00030y-DU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 31 Jan 2009 07:48:26 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LTFGU-00030F-6m for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 31 Jan 2009 07:48:02 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LTFGP-0002zY-HW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 31 Jan 2009 07:47:58 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=35751 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LTFGO-0002zN-Na for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 31 Jan 2009 07:47:56 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout5.012.net.il ([84.95.2.13]:19937) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LTFGO-0000OK-AA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 31 Jan 2009 07:47:56 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.i_mtaout5.012.net.il by i_mtaout5.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2004.12) id <0KEC00C005MXQ800@i_mtaout5.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 31 Jan 2009 14:48:15 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.126.109.18]) by i_mtaout5.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2004.12) with ESMTPA id <0KEC00CX068B6YL0@i_mtaout5.012.net.il>; Sat, 31 Jan 2009 14:48:12 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 9.1 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:108458 Archived-At: > Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 12:28:41 +0100 > From: Juanma Barranquero > Cc: Don Armstrong , emacs-devel@gnu.org > > On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 12:19, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > Sorry, I'm not following: if there's no Rmail package, how come the > > bug tracker finds bugs by that package? What am I missing? > > At the moment, "packages" in the Emacs bugtracker are just arbitrary > labels. The tracker allows searching for these labels. It's a bad thing to call "package" to two different things. How about calling the labels "labels" instead? > A package, apparently, is a label plus some other data, like a > maintainer name & address, etc. There's no package defined for Emacs. Fine, but the "don't submit bug reports" request is misleading and should be removed or rephrased, IMO.